• weeeeum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is probably a hot take but I have the opinion that nature isn’t any more merciful than we are. Existence is suffering and every animal ends up as feed for another.

    Is it better to be raised in horrid conditions in a farm, or to spend every moment of your life scavenging for food, running for your life, while probably infested with parasites just to be torn to pieces, alive, by a wolf or other predator?

    Humans at least have the decency to sedate or knock unconscious our food. Wild animals have to experience being eaten alive.

    • Rob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is a false equivalence; the answer is “neither”.

      Veganism doesn’t seek to end all animal suffering, but not to exploit animals for humans’ sake. We don’t need animal products to survive, so we shouldn’t add to whatever misery already exists naturally.

      In the case of livestock, we should just stop breeding them. No vegan is arguing for dumping all cattle in the savannah to be hunted by lions.

      • Wooki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        False equivalence is the anthropomorphism, animal farming misinformation agendas and generalisations being thrown like it has meaning…