asudox@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoConcerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square182fedilinkarrow-up1671arrow-down189 cross-posted to: selfhosted@lemmit.onlinebitwarden@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showselfhosted@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmit.onlinelinux@programming.devbitwarden@discuss.tchncs.delinux@lemmy.worldphoronix@lemmy.world
arrow-up1582arrow-down1external-linkConcerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comasudox@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square182fedilink cross-posted to: selfhosted@lemmit.onlinebitwarden@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showselfhosted@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmit.onlinelinux@programming.devbitwarden@discuss.tchncs.delinux@lemmy.worldphoronix@lemmy.world
minus-squaremli@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up37·2 months ago Update: Bitwarden posted to X this evening to reaffirm that it’s a “packaging bug” and that “Bitwarden remains committed to the open source licensing model.” According to Bitwardens post here, this is a “packaging bug” and will be resolved.
According to Bitwardens post here, this is a “packaging bug” and will be resolved.