• RoquetteQueen@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Owning giant pickup trucks and SUVs. I’m not that secretive about it, though. I assume everyone driving them is an insecure, overgrown child who wants a big vroom vroom.

    • a1studmuffin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If I know anyone who drives one, I always refer to it jokingly as their 'emotional support vehicle".

    • lath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m not sure about everyone else, but in my case you assume correctly. The only reason I’d want a monster truck is to act like an overgrown child who wants to show off his big vroom vroom. Also, with a mandatory funny honk.

    • Bell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ll go a step further and assume they are…speaking loudly while carrying a small stick.

  • DirigibleProtein@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 months ago

    Being completely unaware of anyone else:

    • Standing in doorways, using your phone or having a conversation
    • Talking loudly when inappropriate, when I’m in pain at the doctors, I don’t want to hear about your roses
    • leaving your shopping trolley blocking the aisle sideways in the supermarket while looking for your stuff
    • driving down the middle of the road so everyone else has to pull over, when there’s plenty of room for two cars to pass
    • stopping in the middle of the road without indicating, while: looking for your destination, or having a conversation, or deciding what day it is
    • riding your delivery bike down the footpath at high speed weaving between pedestrians

    As Jean-Paul Sartre said, “Hell is other people”.

    • N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      stopping in the middle of the road without indicating, while: looking for your destination, or having a conversation, or deciding what day it is

      That’s my new pet peeve. The thing is I don’t remember seeing people do this in the past and certainly not frequently, but now I see it all the time. Mind-boggling selfishness. I think Covid rotted everyone’s brains way more than we realize.

      • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Someone stopped in front of me… on an offramp. Luckily there was nobody behind me to hit me, but that’s an insane place to stop. No hazard lights, no indication. Just stopped.

        • Morgoth_Bauglir@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          I once got caught behind someone who came to an abrupt stop in a roundabout so they could go to the next episode / video on their iPad that they had attached to their dashboard.

          • garibaldi_biscuit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I once had someone do an emergency stop in front of me for no apparent reason in the fast lane of a not very busy motorway. I barely managed to stop in time from high speed.

    • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago
      • riding your delivery bike down the footpath at high speed weaving between pedestrians

      Gotta include the ones riding at night in black/dark clothes with no reflectors or lights; be it using the crosswalk, against a ‘do not cross’ or in the middle of the [car] lane, ignoring the bike lane.

    • Dharma Curious@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I can’t find a source right now, because I just woke up and I don’t want to, so (Trust Me Bro, et al, 2024) but there’s a chance that quote is actually about Nazis!

      A lot of French people referred to them as “the others” and would often speak sort of semi-codedly about them in writing and such so as not to piss off their new overlords. So that line may well not have been “I’m such an introvert that being around other humans is like being in hell” but instead “hell has delivered itself to my doorstep in the form of goose-stepping bastards”

      • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s not at all what the quote is and neither is the top level commenter’s interpretation, and I think it not being these is pretty obvious if you read No Exit. The point that he was making (and this is putting it crassly because I know jack shit about his Heidegger-based phenomenology) is the presence of other people forces us to be self-conscious, to regard ourselves as the object of someone else’s perception and judgement. That’s why Sartre goes out of his way to say the room (their jail cell in Hell, effectively) had no reflective surfaces, so that the character’s perception of themselves could only come from the people they are stuck with (this doesn’t entirely make sense, but I am pretty sure it’s what he meant). You can read him talk about some of the premises informing this by checking out his writing on “The Look,” like is quoted below this comic.

        So it’s a slightly obtuse point about intersubjectivity that people have turned into a cutesy way of talking about their own misanthropy. It’s probably more emblematic of the meaning of the quote how people in this thread, original commenter especially, are talking about silently judging people for this and that action.

  • kubok@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    If you cannot chew with your mouth closed and you are older than 6 years, you should not be allowed to vote, operate heavy machinery or have children.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Passive income” if you describe yourself as having a passive income, I want nothing to do with you.

    Passive income is a myth - all income requires labor… if you’re getting income without putting in labor then you’re stealing someone else’s income.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t because I’m not working in the US but I do have a retirement fund. I can critize the system we live in and those that revel in exploiting it while also realizing that if I completely eschew investment I’ll be a pauper. I’m not going to bankrupt myself and be unable to afford my partner’s medical expenses to win an argument on the internet.

        I’m aware that the stock market is slicing off income from laborers in an unjust manner - it slices off my income as well… I don’t celebrate participating in this system, but I do participate in it while acknowledging how bad it is. It isn’t a significant portion of my income and if I could personally will it out of existence I would.

        • do_not_pm_me@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think the stock market is fine. It allows the people to own a bit of the companies they work for and buy from.

          I don’t see anything wrong with that in theory.

          • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s a critical element of the financialization of the economy that has lead to it becoming even more irrational and unstable than it was before. Easy example, look up stock buybacks. It’s not just that though, it’s the entire system of obligation to shareholders to deliver quarterly gains with no concern for employees or even the long-term health of the company.

    • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      What if I did a bunch of work in the past and I am still getting income from that work, even though I do almost nothing to keep that income coming in now?

    • Lenny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I make about $1k a month absolutely, completely passively from Amazon. I’ve put in maybe 30 minutes in three years. When I tell people this, they see that passive income is real.

      Then I tell them about the years before that, where I spent every second I had making shirt and book designs. I had made a single sale early on and I saw the potential, so I sunk every godforsaken hour I had to spare (I also worked full time) designing and uploading, researching, networking, and pushing. I gambled, grafted, and earned it.

      It’s absolutely worth the investment, but I only know that now. Back then it was an insane gamble - hundreds of hours of proper work for ???. I stop telling people about my ‘passive’ income now because no one wants to ruin the dream of freeeee money.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You’re heart is in the right place, but your conclusion is wrong. It’s entirely possible to build a passive income without involving anyone else’s labor. Without even getting into things like investment income, which I’m assuming you’ll still attribute to someone else’s labor in the most abstract sense, there are still plenty of ways to do this. I personally lived off mostly passive income for several years when blogging was big. I created a bunch of blogs myself, did all of the development and design myself, managed the servers myself, and wrote all of the content myself. Then I put a few non-intrusive ads on the sites. When they started generating pretty good money, I mostly stopped working on them. They continued generating decent money until social media killed blogging. I still have one of them, and I receive around $60 per month from it despite the fact that I haven’t touched it in over a decade. So, how exactly was/am I stealing someone else’s labor?

      • rekabis@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I created a bunch of blogs myself, did all of the development and design myself, managed the servers myself, and wrote all of the content myself.

        Sure sounds like labour to me.

        And there is no requirement for labour to generate income immediately. A majority of labour is front-loaded, with income being back-loaded.

        I still have one of them, and I receive around $60 per month from it despite the fact that I haven’t touched it in over a decade.

        Server maintenance and updating code to work with current releases is still “labour”. Because sure as shit you’ve been doing these things… no hosting provider is going to let you go 10 years with zero updates or patches to the website or the underlying framework that allows the website to run. Because failing to do that is how entire hosting platforms get rooted and infected with malware.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sure sounds like labour to me.

          Yes, my labor, which resulted in passive income. Nobody is saying that passive income is a magical thing which you just acquire without effort. You invest the effort, and then you sit back and reap the rewards.

          • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            By your definition game development (in the old style) is also passive income… so is art… so is building a house or a car or pretty much any form of manufacturing.

            These activities all involve building something with no promise of selling it - then trying to find a buyer… in each case you, the producer, are investing up front in a venture which may or may not succeed and then hoping someone will pay you for it.

            • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Homebuilding would be active income, since you can only sell each house once. Game development would be a good example for someone like the Minecraft creator. He invested a bunch of time creating this cool game, and then he sat back and got rich. It’s passive at that point (assuming no maintenance, bug fixes, etc.), since he continues to gain sales, despite only doing the work once. The digital realm is full of opportunities for passive income, or at least it used to be. Corporations have essentially shoved individual creators out of the market.

              Edit: I’m aware that the Minecraft creator sold the game, but was using his earlier experiences as an example. I read an interview with him once and he said “I think I was already rich by the time I thought ‘holy shit, I’m going to be rich!’”.

  • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    All the people typing “loose” when they mean “lose”. Shit’s been happening a lot for the past year or two and I don’t know why.

    • Rogue@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s just the natural evolution of language. Rules become loser over time

      • modeler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Some rules weaken, and others are created or subtly change - that’s why parents can never get their kids’ slang quite right. It’s not that the parents can’t simply weaken their grammar, it’s that the kids do some things differently with very strict rules.

    • lath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because phonetically, it’s “loos” vs “looz”. And people don’t care enough to know or apply the difference.

  • JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    Whenever another guy recommends something I find repulsive, for various reasons, I tend to write off most respect I had for that person.
    Lately some guys have talked positively about Andrew Tate, and it’s just made it easier for me to know who is a gullible prick and who to avoid.

  • Rose Thorne(She/Her)@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Leaving things they decided they don’t want just wherever in a store. It’s annoying as a customer, because now I have to dig through their mess to get the product I actually wanted, and even moreso as an employee.

    At least put it back in the right department. The underpaid employees who have been there since before the store opened for the day really don’t want to have to play the game of “How long has this ground beef been sitting in a produce basket, and how much product did we just lose?”

    • weeeeum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      I remember a story of a guy talking about how the store reeked and smelled terrible. After doing tons of searching at the epicenter of the smell, turns out some guy hid a 5 pound beef brisket on the bottom shelf, hidden behind a bunch of breakfast cereal.

      • Rose Thorne(She/Her)@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can and will find terrifying things working in grocery.

        I once found a pack of beef jerky that had become 90% mold. It was tucked all the way towards the back of the shelves, partially shoved into the crack between two of them. We had no clue how long it had been sitting back there, because jerky rarely needed a full teardown.

          • Rose Thorne(She/Her)@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            Found a package of ground beef randomly hidden in the very back of the milk cooler. Thankfully kept fairly cool, and still in date, but a customer had stuck it there because he wanted to come back later. He came back the next day and tried to file a complaint because it wasn’t there.

            Fish left in the bathroom. Like, straight up a pack of salmon fillets, just left there on the top of the toilet tank. Our best guess was that someone wanted to steal it, but either couldn’t fit it or got spooked and just abandoned it. It was in a far corner, barely used bathroom, too.

            Half eaten fruit or candy thats been shoved to the back of a low shelf. You know a kid did it, there’s massive mess back there, and depending on what aisle they hid it in, it might have been there for a couple days to a week. Once found a bell pepper some kid had chomped into.

            This is more just “general trash”, but still not uncommon if your store has a hotbar: Stolen food containers. People grab their dinner, eat it throughout the store, and then just put the trash wherever. If you’re lucky, they leave it somewhere obvious. If you’re unlucky, you find an open container of half-eaten rotisserie chicken shoved into a vent after they turned the heat on for the winter. Going past the deli in my store has triggered minor PTSD at times. That smell… Just… Hot rot. That’s the only way to describe it. Rotting garbage, oven warmed.

            • crowbar@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              People… with a functioning brain… did those things??? What are we? Hairless apes?

    • bl4kers@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think there’s some misconceptions about this that need to be cleared up. If you don’t want it and you’ve already moved away from the section, the best thing to do is take it to the register and say you don’t want it. Then what typically happens is it gets put in a take-back cart and the employees take care of it

  • Quail4789@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    People who brag their infant child is so smart they can use YouTube to find and watch videos when in reality they’re shitty parents who got a 2-year old addicted YouTube that’s specifically designed to be navigable by kids.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Oh yeah, I’ll quickly shut that down when they wanna do that “kids these days with the technology” nonsense, usually as some excuse for why these older folks who’ve had 40+ years to figure out computers still can’t check their own email.

      No, Timmy isn’t “so smart with technology” because he can consoom on a device designed for infinite low-friction consumption.

  • No1@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The ‘brands’ they are displaying.

    I see people checking me and others out. What runners are they? Jordans or KMart? Is that a Lacoste or walmart? Is that a real Rolex or D&G handbag?

    But for me, it’s not judging them like you think.

    I judge them flashing brands as a sign of insecurity, a need to appear wealthy and ‘fit in’, and a likely ‘keep up with the Jones’ jealous type.

    So, I actually feel sad for them.

    And, yes, I am aware it’s super judgemental and I’m no doubt hypocritical as well, as there are some things I will buy certain brands for.

    • lath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Difference is between buying a brand for style and buying it for quality.

      Some companies have quietly admitted that the only difference between their stuff and cheap knockoffs is the brand name and it’s fine for them because their customers don’t care.

    • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I can relate.

      Everytime I see some Gucci stuff on someone, I feel hard sad for them or sometimes cringe, because all the money they once had, was spent on something worthless in my eyes. They also look more unsympathic by having those brand stuff on them, so its a lot that plays in.

      But if they don’t look entirely iced out, then I mostly don’t even notice that the person has Expensive brand clothes or generally popular brands. I mostly see the overall design or the colors besides the Human and the face. I have my energy somehwere else to invest than thinking on ehat brands someone is wearing.

    • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Rich people don’t wear brands. Visible brands are for working class people who want to be rich. It’s the sign of a class traitor.

  • TastyWheat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Shit Parking.

    If you’re driving a 2 ton metal box and can’t have the spatial awareness to fit it into a large rectangle, you shouldn’t be on the road.