jeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 30 days agoElizabeth Warren calls for crackdown on Internet “monopoly” you’ve never heard ofarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up133arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zip
arrow-up133arrow-down1external-linkElizabeth Warren calls for crackdown on Internet “monopoly” you’ve never heard ofarstechnica.comjeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 30 days agomessage-square36fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zip
minus-squarewhithom@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·19 days ago.a, .b, .c… Why are they limiting us? Seems like ICANN has an unfair position. Someone should start a competing dns that allows domain registrations with single letter domains. That’s kind of how .onion works (for dns)
minus-squaresem@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·19 days agoYou haven’t answered why somebody would want these confusing tlds
minus-squarewhithom@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·19 days agoIt’s not confusing. It’s just a tld.
minus-squaresem@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·19 days agoAlright Mr. https://google.com.html
minus-squarewhithom@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·19 days agoA url is a url. If your only concern is that it might be confusing to the user, then we shouldn’t have TLDs at all. googIe.com and google.com are different. What now? Force serif fonts?
.a, .b, .c…
Why are they limiting us? Seems like ICANN has an unfair position.
Someone should start a competing dns that allows domain registrations with single letter domains.
That’s kind of how .onion works (for dns)
You haven’t answered why somebody would want these confusing tlds
It’s not confusing. It’s just a tld.
Alright Mr. https://google.com.html
A url is a url. If your only concern is that it might be confusing to the user, then we shouldn’t have TLDs at all.
googIe.com and google.com are different. What now? Force serif fonts?
Literally insane take