TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldM to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 1 month agoListenlemmy.worldimagemessage-square96fedilinkarrow-up134arrow-down12
arrow-up132arrow-down1imageListenlemmy.worldTokenBoomer@lemmy.worldM to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square96fedilink
minus-squareDrusas@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoThere is nothing concrete to act upon. “Do something” is too vague.
minus-squareSmoogs@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·1 month agoThat’s what you’re doing here also.
minus-squaremoriquende@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·1 month agoSo you believe it would be better if he didn’t write at all unless he has some concrete action points for you?
minus-squaremoriquende@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·1 month agoThinking about an issue is already an implicit action point that you’re forced into by reading about it. Also, it motivates further discussion out of which ideas can emerge. Naming problems is valuable by itself.
Why not?
There is nothing concrete to act upon. “Do something” is too vague.
That’s what you’re doing here also.
So you believe it would be better if he didn’t write at all unless he has some concrete action points for you?
Not for me. For at least someone.
Thinking about an issue is already an implicit action point that you’re forced into by reading about it. Also, it motivates further discussion out of which ideas can emerge. Naming problems is valuable by itself.