• southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is why it’s important to remember that in any revolution, resistance, or targeted action, it’s the police that are the first enemy. They’ll be the ones that respond first, and will likely toe the line the most reliably.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    NY transit starts getting complaints about an ad they have no idea about.

    “No, m’mam, we don’t have a death penalty policy…no…no m’man, I don’t know what poster you saw…”

      • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Fortunately none of them died as far as I can find. Surgeons had to crack open the skull of the bystander they shot in the back of the head to relieve his brain swelling though. I hope he recovers because he’s gonna be set for life.

        They spent 150 million on overtime for cops to stop fare evasion. How much were they losing in fares? I’m gonna go ahead and guess it wasn’t even a teeny fraction of that.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          They spent 1500x more on enforcement than they could have ever recovered from fare evaders. Just like every single other monitoring and enforcement program for public services.

          Has there ever been a single program like that which is actually a net positive? Fare enforcement, food stamps means testing, public services with drug screens, “welfare queen” check ups, means testing, etc. I’m not aware of a single instance where it wouldn’t have been cheaper just to let a few people get benefits that “didn’t deserve them” than putting these restrictions in place

          But God’s forbid we let poor people have nice things, or just to do good things for our society. Goddamned toxic puritanicalism. …

          • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Somebody on Lemmy a while back asked about the phrase, “the cruelty is the point,” and whether it was true and fair. Well, here’s the evidence: The point is not a net gain on fare collections.

            The fact that the numbers are public and they keep doing it proves it: The cruelty is the point.

          • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Absolutely right. Brings to mind something I read a while ago which I will paraphrase.

            “Liberals want everyone to get what they need even if a few cheat the system. Conservatives want nobody to get what they need if there’s a chance anyone will cheat the system.”

          • falcunculus@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I disagree, the poor would be worse off without public transit since else it’d be much harder for them to move around. In fact many if not most public transit systems are subsidized and operate at a loss.

            The richer don’t use it and so care little, beyond the macro level that it benefits businesses and such.

            • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Public transit never turns a profit, not because it’s bad business but simply down to the economics of providing affordable transit. In fact, fares recover such a small percentage of a public transit agency’s budget that there’s good arguments being made for making public transit fare free. Public transit is a net good for communities so making it as accessible to those who want or need it is important

            • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I think you may have missed his point. He wasn’t arguing against public transit, just the fare. It should be free. For the reasons you yourself mentioned.

      • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The fun part is of the 4 people shot, only the one had skipped the fare. Two were bystanders, one was another cop.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      While I feel a little bad about the folks no doubt receiving those calls, this is so deliciously amusing to contemplate.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’d say a bit of both. The numbers they showed for it if I remember was that they spent $150m to catch like $100,000 of fares that were skipped. Then throw in 4 people dead and you didn’t do much to help. You just made it more miserable for people travelling.

      With fares making up 23% of your income, and payroll taking up over 30% of expenses… Odds are they could cut the number of guards patrolling tolls, ticket sales people, customer service reps, maintenance workers for all the machines/guard terminals etc by a shit ton and make the transportation free, and offset the costs elsewhere. It would also likely boost the economy of the area, do to people not needing to scrape together a couple dollars to take the train and spending it at businesses they otherwise may normally avoid do to costs or not having that extra few dollars.

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well, I’ll give you an update here as I have boots on the ground:

        They cut back on the amount of cops on the platforms now—but now every single exit door has a private guard (one of those rent a cop companies). So now they’re bringing privatized security into the mix. But there are still cops on the platforms! Just not as many at the door because they’ve hired some security guards to have the same effect an MTA person has, which means they can’t really do shit if you don’t let them stop you.

        So a slightly different way to waste money.

      • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        In Ontario, asshole political leader Doug Ford is trying to stop free public transit by paying for transit cops out of the provincial budget. That way no one can make the payment you just made. Can we have the same amount of money to spend on improving public transit? No. The only thing fearless leader Doug Ford fears more than free public transit is good public transit.

        What a bag of dicks. Watch other conservative states and provinces follow his lead!

        https://ottawa.ctvnews.ca/doug-ford-announces-money-for-cops-asylum-seekers-in-ottawa-no-new-transit-funds-1.7098980

        • yonder@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Wait, where in Ontario has free transit? The topic of your article, Ottawa, charges for transit.

          • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It was floated last election and has made the rounds a few times. This is a pre emptive attack.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      When shouting DefundThePolice/PoliceReform is seen as offensive, this is how you convince the people.

  • Apathy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    At this point it would be better usage of money to make it a surveillance state instead of a police state, cameras won’t shoot you

  • capital@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Damn that’s crazy. No mention of the guy rushing police with a knife when confronted and told to pay, screaming “shoot me shoot me shoot me”.

      • TootTootComingThru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It didn’t magically disappear, some rando picked it up and walked away with it while the cops were dealing with the guy.

        There are videos of the whole thing online, you should watch them. Fuck the police but let’s be honest about that particular situation.

        • icanred@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Shh. You are disrupting the lemmy echochamber! It’s all about the headlines and taglines. No facts

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      He didn’t rush at the police. He simply had a knife. And that doesn’t justify shooting into a crowd, and with piss poor aim.

        • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I watched the video. He wasn’t rushing the cop, he was trying to get away, just didn’t realize that the other cop had gotten around him. There’s a noticeable moment when he suddenly recognizes that’s a cop he was about to run past, his body language shows he was surprised.

          • capital@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            This is a crock of shit. Unless the guy’s blind.

            We can see him look at the officer who’s wearing the cam. I’ll even link the timestamp: https://youtu.be/-EaAraFPzEo?t=956

            Cops try a few times to use less lethal means, they step off the train, guy with knife sees the cop, then CHASES the cop with the knife in his hand. Stop lying.

            Sees cop:

            Begins chasing cop:

            Top of my list of ways to get shot by police? Chase one with a knife in my hand.

  • ealoe@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The fare enforcement was of course a huge overreach and waste of resources, spending something absurd like 1000x what it recovered. The cops didn’t shoot people over a fare, they shot because someone pulled a knife on them, after trying to use a Taser which failed. Not really sure what else people expect will result if someone pulls a knife on someone with a gun, cop or not.

  • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It won’t load for me on Voyager. Comment to check with sync and desktop.

    Edit: doesn’t load on sync either.

  • ntma@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I always laugh at the people who pay for fares for public transportation. It’s an honor system. You just get on and don’t pay. No one ever says anything. And those police officers who are supposed to check never say anything.

    • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      And those police officers who are supposed to check never say anything.

      unless you look not white and/or housed enough to them

      • ntma@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I check both of those boxes and still don’t get hassled.

    • AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I pay for public tranposrtation because I like my bus drivers. should I have to? no, it should be 100% publicly funded. but it’s not, so I do.

    • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      In Dallas the light rail normally doesn’t check but they’re doing it more frequently now mainly to get homeless people off the trains, and they will make you get off if you don’t have a ticket. The busses always check though.

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I believe that public transportation should be free, especially for low income individuals. I don’t fit that definition anymore, so I am happy to pay to help keep it funded.

    • falcunculus@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If it’s a honor system that you don’t obey, are we to conclude you are without honor? ^^

      • ntma@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Tis not due yet; I would be loath to pay him before his day. What need I be so forward with him that calls not on me? Well, ’tis no matter; honour pricks me on. Yea, but how if honour prick me off when I come on? how then? Can honour set to a leg? no: or an arm? no: or take away the grief of a wound? no. Honour hath no skill in surgery, then? no. What is honour? a word. What is in that word honour? what is that honour? air. A trim reckoning! Who hath it? he that died o’ Wednesday. Doth he feel it? no. Doth he hear it? no. ‘Tis insensible, then. Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? no. Why? detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I’ll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon: and so ends my catechism.

  • auzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I know what the person is trying to say.

    But It’s a bad look for them, as it comes across as them trying to suggest that stealing is ok.

    Not everyone skipping fares can’t afford it

    • tmyakal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Skipping a fare should not be punishable by death, I don’t care how wealthy the skipper is.

      • auzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        That’s not what happened here most likely. No references, no context

        Chances are someone got aggressive or violent whilst being arrested due to ticket theft

        There’s a reason there is no real info here

        Nobody is going to go and shoot someone because they see them jump over a barrier. Something else happened

        • tmyakal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Assuming you are correct, being aggressive or violent whilst being arrested for a $3 crime should be punishable by death?

          • auzy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Wtf?

            So it’s OK to be violent if you’re a petty criminal, as long as you’re being arrested? So, you can’t arrest people anymore?

            You guys aren’t even trying to make sense…

            The poster doesn’t even have any references. But, I’m fairly sure nobody is shooting anyone because they don’t have a ticket. Unless you have actual references, I’m calling BS. The people got shot for another reason. They may have been getting arrested at the time, but that doesn’t give them sovereignty over normal laws.

            The reason this poster has no references, is because it is likely BS, and knows people like yourself will fall for it.

            There is obviously much more to this story, if it is true at all.

            I think I know how Trump won now lol

            • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              The people got shot for another reason.

              So I’ll fill you in since you’re obviously out of the loop. The 4 people were shot in one incident. One guy skipped a fare, then refused to stop for police. He tried to get away. He had a knife. Cops tried to tase him, that didn’t work. Cops got scared. Guy tried to run away, cops shot him, two bystanders, and one of the cops.

              Yes, they’re leaving out details to point out how ridiculous it is- but it is ridiculous. At no point was the guy enough of a threat to anyone to escalate to deadly force. They’re transit cops, they have radios- they don’t have to let him go, just take a second to tell the train crew to not leave the station, then wait him out.

      • auzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        False equivalency

        Neither are ok. And I’m not saying they are

        In fact, Trumpians do this.

        Trump will do 1000 shitty things. And he’ll get his followers to focus on 1 thing

        We don’t even know the full context here.

      • auzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Lol

        That’s not what I said. False equivalency.

        And there is no context here or anything. I doubt anyone got shot because of not paying for their ticket

        They probably got aggressive or violent, and it just happened to be whilst they were being arrested.

      • Woht24@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        At a minimum.

        Also bring poor, coloured, the wrong gender or any other reason.