• dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    This was literally the basis of the National Firearms Act, which is a federal gun law we very much already have and have done for a long time. It was originally enacted in the 1930’s with the express purpose of preventing the blacks poors from achieving arms parity with which to defend themselves from whites the rich, and had a specific focus on “concealable” arms which could conceivably be used to take out high profile political targets. Which is something that was at the forefront of every seedy politician’s mind in the era coming right out of Prohibition and leading into the Great Depression, I’m sure. Boy, that sounds eerily familiar.

    The NFA bans a wide swath of arms and arms adjacent things including short barreled rifles and shotguns, fully automatic guns, and silencers/suppressors.

    Oh, wait. Did I say “banned?” It actually just slaps a mandatory $200 federal tax on them with a ton of paperwork, with failure to comply under penalty of the ATF kicking in your door and shooting your dog. Note that in the 1930’s $200 was an exorbitant amount of money that would be absolutely unattainable for the working classes simply to afford a shooty toy, but was easily within reach of the robber barons of the time. Oh, and the police and military also got a full exception. Of course. For reference, $200 in 1934 dollars (when this was passed) is equivalent to $4,711.40 today. And for further perspective, a nice shotgun in 1935 would cost you around $40 in the currency of that time.

    “Sure, boy, you can own that gun. All you have to do is file all this extra paperwork and pay us five times more than what it’s worth in taxes.”

    Related fun fact: The original incarnation of the NFA was originally intended to apply to all handguns. Think about that one for a minute.

    (Edit: This was meant as an addition, not a correction.)

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      Yes, and basically what I’m saying is

      A) That’s bad, the us poors (not trying to speak for you, but that includes me lol I’m poor af) deserve the right to SBRs, SBSs, suppressors, AOWs and IMO, FA, just as much as any rich bastard who can pay the fees.

      And

      B) As we can see from this very incident, taxing it does fuck all, murders can still happen even with those taxes, and by a poor without stamps at that. Even if we amended that tax to be the price of a Corolla today, I guarantee he didn’t even pay the $200 tax (if he did he’d have had a booster on the can lol), if you’re going to murder a dude on camera at 6am on a busy street in a city where suppressors are illegal you’re not gonna fill out a form 4.