• Thrillhouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 days ago

    Yes you should say that person you hired sucked or did not meet your expectations for the job.

    Not all information is cleared away, the information pertinent to the performance of the job remains, which should be the only information that matters when the topic of discussion is someone’s job performance.

    Unless, that is, you’ve met and tested the performance of every white guy available to you. Otherwise you’re painting people with the same brush. X type of people are Y is racist thinking.

      • Thrillhouse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        “Gross Incompetence of specifically Indian Immigrants

        He says:

        No offence… but they are just so stupid

        Also

        I also lead a team offshore in India and work with many of them

        It’s not “just this one guy” - he’s painting ALL Indian immigrants (plural) based on his experience with this ONE guy, and the offshore team he has worked with.

          • Thrillhouse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            Yes, in order to justify the point of view that ALL Indian immigrants are stupid.

            It’s in the title my guy.

            If I were to say I refuse to hire people who like Matt Walsh, because in my point of view they’re all dumbfucks, that’s discrimination. It’s why we have laws in the West against that sort of thing. It works both ways for identities and points of view you subscribe to.

            It’s just a more complex answer than “it’s just an opinion man.” That’s 1950s thinking - and yeah it was a simpler time because white men owned almost everything in the West and everyone else could go fuck themselves.