Disclaimer: Fuck the rich and please consider reading 1 paragraph before you go to comments to explain how I am a bootlicker. Thank you ٩(•͈ ꇴ •͈)و ̑̑❀

For context, I generally report all calls to violence, no matter who the “victim” is, whether they are a public figure or an anonymous user. I didn’t even register that the person I was “defending” was rich—I’m just aware that calls to violence are against most instances’ terms of service (due to legal threats). Genuinely sorry seahorse! I wish you just had something in your instance sidebar or even spoke to me instead of jumping to ban and “lib” insults!

Unverifiable information you will have to take my word for (per community rules)

Apologized to seahorse and got:

My own personal curiosities only adjacently related

Correct me if I’m wrong, isn’t this a bit of an abuse of federation? This is the same admin that pulled the move with the doxxing of Nick Fuentes. By banning users for reporting content that may violate our local instance rules, seahorse is making our local instances harder to moderate for our admins. (Honestly I respect the commitment to the running a very open and uncensored instance, but until Lemmy has the option to only report to local admins versus local & federated authorities, this may not be the best strategy?)

Anyway, this is pretty interesting. I’m honestly not too pressed about this (mostly I will miss !theonion@midwest.social) and curious what yall think. :)

  • timestatic@feddit.org
    25·
    13 days ago

    So what you’re saying is you don’t really care if there’s call for violence and are indifferent to people being killed/attacked because of it. All you care about is protecting the instances and its admins legally?

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOPEnglish
      92·
      13 days ago

      sure. whatever. not the most accurate description of what im saying but a lot damn closer than other people have been.

      • i don’t characterize it as “protecting” im literally just hilighting a potential issue that can be ignored or addressed.
      • i am not indifferent to any violence and my relationship to violence does not play into my decision to report content.

      i don’t understand why you and others think there is such a moral mesage behind clicking the report button. it’s two clicks and a text field to say “hey, found this, wanted to bring it to your attention but it’s not up to me in the end.”

      • timestatic@feddit.org
        4·
        13 days ago

        Personally when I report things its mostly because of my own moral responsibility to support the removal of certain harmful content. Ofc I also want to see lemmy communities thrive but thats just part of it.

        • spujb@lemmy.cafeOPEnglish
          42·
          13 days ago

          Interesting! Genuinely surprised to hear these differences from my perspective. :)

          Obviously moral responsibility does play into it for me too to a degree, for example one of the big ones for me on Lemmy is its issue with sexism so I report A LOT of comments for that. But of course, that always is in reference to the community or instance rules that forbid misogyny and hate speech.

          There aren’t any my instance doesn’t defederate, but if there were any communities that actively supported misogynistic speech? I would have no reason to want those communities/instances of Lemmy to succeed and I would rather work to get that instanced defederated or that community erased than bother with trying to fix the issue by reporting individual posts to inattentive mods.

          Thanks for your insight.