• timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    I almost think that’s a pro. I don’t understand how signal intends to pay for servers forever with voluntary donations. Though I’d be fine if they set up a mandatory annual fee.

    Signal is far more polished IMO but both are great.

    • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      I almost think that’s a pro. I don’t understand how signal intends to pay for servers forever with voluntary donations.

      In the same vein, a privately owned service, to me, is rather suspect if it is free of cost — the money’s gotta come from somewhere.

    • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      I don’t understand how signal intends to pay for servers forever with voluntary donations.

      I think donations can be sustainable if the service in question is handled correctly. Imo, federation/decentralization would improve this, as it wouldn’t place the cost burden on a single entity.