Summary

Bishop Garrison, a former Pentagon official who led a 2021 investigation into military extremism, warns that recent New Year’s Day attacks by military personnel highlight the ongoing threat of radicalization and distress in the armed forces.

Despite a report recommending counter-extremism measures, its policies were never implemented, facing backlash from right-wing figures, including Trump’s defense secretary nominee, Pete Hegseth.

As Hegseth aims to dismantle counter-extremism programs, Garrison stresses the risks of neglecting the issue, citing cultural and mental health challenges within the military.

      • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Lmao. You’re the one making claims about me being wrong, so you have to provide arguments for why that is. Saying “i know why you’re wrong, but that’s for you to find out” is lazy debating

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          30 minutes ago

          Your premise is willfully devoid of any condition or nuance for deliberate effect. It deserves no respect.

          Extremes of government are authoritarian. Left or right. Extremes of personal ideologies can be violent or even terrorism. Extremism is harm.

          Believing things to be good like environmental regulation, universal health care, civil rights, or even in BLM is not extreme when they seek to undo or prevent objective harm and injustice. Maybe you are deliberately being stupid to make a point, but it’s patently obvious the parent comment pointed out the hypocrisy in labeling what constitutes extreme.

          • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 minutes ago

            Believing things to be good like environmental regulation, universal health care, civil rights, or even in BLM is not extreme when they seek to undo or prevent objective harm and injustice.

            I think there might have been a misunderstanding. When I mentioned left-wing extremism, I was referring specifically to ideologies like communism and their historical tendencies toward authoritarianism—not to more moderate left-wing policies like universal health care or civil rights, which I agree aren’t extreme. My point was that extremism, whether left or right, often leads to authoritarian outcomes

            • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 minutes ago

              Then you should have expended the time to nuance your position rather than making an appeal to hypocrisy argument and wasting your and everyone else’s time. However, your argumentative follow up responses don’t really do your claim of “misunderstanding” any favors.

        • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Let me try to be more clear: I don’t give a shit if you continue to be ignorant, there are millions of you. I don’t owe you anything.

          Now the choice to keep being uninformed is yours alone, but as a human being with the capacity for human reasoning I thought you might enjoy the opportunity to be less dumb.

          Your choice is yours!