• alvvayson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is true. But it is also because there isn’t a much better alternative.

    The Palestinians don’t have a Nelson Mandela, MLK or Mahatma Gandhi kind of person that the western world can rally around and support.

    Like, I’m sitting here at home in Europe, thoroughly disapproving of Israel, while being also fully disgusted by what Hamas did.

    And I understand why Palestinians fight. I can understand that they can’t be fully pacifist and that they don’t have the capability to wage a normal war, so they result to asymmetric warfare.

    But if they had just cleanly killed or kidnapped the adults and spared the children, that would have been the minimum to not fully alienate a lot of people who are sympathetic to their cause.

    I guess Yasser Arafat was the best they had and it only went downhill after that.

    • FMT99@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The problem I have with the “both sides” argument is while I agree we should not approve of Hamas’ actions, Israel routinely murders civilians without consequence. We tut and tsk but we still send them basically unlimited aid and approval.

      Yes both sides behave badly but one side does so with our explicit support.

      • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s a bit of a moral difference though. When you say ‘routinely murders civilians’, in a lot of cases we’re talking about protestors throwing rocks or molotovs at police or soldiers. Or when Hamas is firing missiles from a schoolyard or the roof of a hospital. Where do you draw the line where police/army/country has the right to defend themselves? Of course it creates a tense situation and Israel is going to close ranks around those who are far too trigger happy.

        But there’s still a huge difference with Hamas’ stated and demonstrated goal to kill off all jews. Israel is trying to bully the muslims so that they would emigrate, but they’re not killing civilians to wipe them out (if that were the case they would be failing).

        As a comparison Israel is acting more like Morocco colonising the Western Sahara and Hamas is acting like Europeans genociding the Native Americans

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          IDF soldiers have murdered plenty of children. It is routine and I don’t care if they are protesting, they are entitled to protest oppression.

          Hamas are disgusting and Israel are cunts but Hamas is because of what Israel does.

          • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well if you casually leave out that part it becomes a lie by omission. And there’s a reason you have to use this lie both to yourself and to others. It has a whole different ring to it when you say “IDF regularly shoot teenagers throwing molotov cocktails in protest” instead of “routinely murdering children”.

          • Locrin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Israel made those men kill hundreds of people at a concert. They had no other choice. Brave protestors. Do you even listen to yourself?

            • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yeah they absolutely did, by teaching the people that shit was normal by doing it to them for generations. Murdering civilians who are celebrating is just how they say hi, so they shouldn’t be surprised pikachu face when they do it right back to them.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t forget how Israel sells world-class spyware to despots and dictators, who use it to terrorise journalists and political opponents.

      • alvvayson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        We (the EU at least) also send a lot of aid to Palestinians.

        Israel should be sanctioned and decolonized like South Africa was.

        And I, for one, believe that that would have happened a long time ago if the Palestinians had followed the Nelson Mandela and Mahatma Gandhi playbook.

        Perhaps I am wrong. Like the rest of the world, I also don’t have the solution for this quagmire.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The experiment has actually been running already. The Gaza Strip is run by Hamas, which is violent and pushes back against Israel however they can. The West Bank is run by Fatah, which has been attempting to keep good relations with Israel and work with them.

          Despite that, the West Bank has seen a continuing encroachment of illegal Israeli settlers, continuing violence directed at Palestinians, both by the settlers moving in there and by the Israeli army. The reason the border with Gaza was so ill-defended was because Netanyahu had moved much of the force usually stationed there into the West Bank. Palestinian deaths in the West Bank has been rising.

          I don’t think the Mahatma Ghandi approach is likely to work in the Middle East. At least no better than any other approach people have been trying has been working there.

        • FMT99@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Development aid, not weapons as the west supplies to Israel. But otherwise you’re right. The whole region should be disarmed.

        • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The US sends aid to palestine as well, just nowhere near as much as we do to israel.

          And there isn’t a good solution. No matter what, everybody will be mad. Mad and not violent would be nice, though.

    • Cerbero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thing also is that those people were also hated during thier time and also called terrorists. There’s no good options for a leader sadly.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Oh sure, there is some factions within the West, but on the whole they agree on the big stuff. It’s why they’re all allied with eachother in the first place. It’s not a hive mind, it’s a team.

        • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is the sort of thing that reminds me never to trust the accepted wisdom of internet groups.

          Gandhi after being educated in England was only a little less racist then everyone else when he first went to South Africa and made the famous comment you’re referring to… He then had his awakening against oppression and began to fight for an end to racism, one of the main popular scandals against Gandhi in South Africa was that the medical corp he set up would give aid to whoever needed it first regardless of rank, colour or ethnicity. The rest of his life he wrote and fought for the rights of all.

          But of course ‘popular person was actually bad’ is a fun hot take so of course it’s going to be banded around without any nuance.