• notabot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      While it’s definitely bleak, it’s not quite as bleak as that. Remember that we’re leaving behind vast amounts of ‘waste’, much of which contains things like copper, aluminium, steel and other useful components in relatively easily refinable states.

      Future civilisations will be digging through our waste, wondering why we were so profligate, but glad to have it all to hand.

      • xapr [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I had thought about this scenario before too, but now I can think of many other scenarios where this doesn’t happen.

        Examples: a complete loss of most of humanity’s technological know-how to where we don’t even know how or why use those materials, loss of knowledge of where many of these (mostly difficult to harvest?) resources are buried, and warring between factions for access to these resources. Not only each of those scenarios individually, but also a combination of all of them plus other factors working against this happening.

        I think that the eventual best case scenario for humanity will be going back to pre-industrial living and technology.

        • notabot@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Those are fair points, but consider that they just put the next civilization at the same level we were; we didn’t have the technological know-how until we invented it, we didn’t know how or why to use different ores until we worked it out, we didn’t know where the ores were to be found until we gound them, and harvesting pre-refined material is much less intensive than that, and well, we’ve warred, and continued to war over access to resources.

          Basically, we’ve dug up lots of the easily accessible ore, which has a low density (you need to dig up maybe 4 tonnes of rock to get a tonne of iron ore, and that is only between 50-75% iron, for instance) and buried it more shallowly, and at higher density. There’s still work to do to extract it, but it’s manageable with fairly low tech.

          Energy sources are a little more complex, but we’ve bound up a lot of hydrocarbons in plastic and the like, which should be usable, if not ideal in their raw form.

          • xapr [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Those are good points too, that I hadn’t thought about. I thought it would be challenging, but maybe it wouldn’t be as challenging as I had imagined it.

            But who knows, maybe we would be better off going back to pre-industrial times anyway?

            • notabot@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              But who knows, maybe we would be better off going back to pre-industrial times anyway?

              But how would I find interesting conversations on Lemmy if my highest tech gadget was a loom?!? :)