The payment was made just before everything got DOGEd
It was a valid payment, not made in error. They decided after the fact that they didn’t like the valid payment, and reversed it. This likely involved fraud, because that’s not a valid reason to reverse a payment.
You’re glossing over the most important word:
It was a valid payment, not made in error. They decided after the fact that they didn’t like the valid payment, and reversed it. This likely involved fraud, because that’s not a valid reason to reverse a payment.
Well, DOGE would totally say “No U” and assert that the program was fraudulent in the first place, because they don’t agree with it politically.
Not a valid reason according to who? The monkeys are running the circus now. There are no rules.