• Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t understand why everyone in the aviation community seems to hate canards and atthis point in too afraid to ask why…

    • Da Bald Eagul@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I didn’t get it either, they look pretty cool. According to Wikipedia they are bad for stealth, though.

      Canard aircraft can potentially have poor stealth characteristics because they present large angular surfaces that tend to reflect radar signals forwards.

      Source (Wikipedia)

      • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Oh well the answer is obvious, as Ellen Mosque once said, no plane is actually a stealth plane because cameras can still see them, so canards obviously don’t make a difference!

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          I also wonder about acoustic signatures on these supercruise 6th gen models. Sure, you spend less cumulative time behind enemy lines, but microphones are cheap and sonic booms are nicely all-at-once and loud. Especially if you’re flying nape of the Earth for the additional radar and IR/optical cover.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Just going to point out that these are not a comparison between American and European design bureaus, it’s a comparison between American and European artists.