fossilesque@mander.xyz to Academia@mander.xyzEnglish · 11 months agoReproducibility trial: 246 biologists get different results from same data setswww.nature.comexternal-linkmessage-square2fedilinkarrow-up123arrow-down12cross-posted to: hackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.partybecomeme@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up121arrow-down1external-linkReproducibility trial: 246 biologists get different results from same data setswww.nature.comfossilesque@mander.xyz to Academia@mander.xyzEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square2fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.partybecomeme@sh.itjust.works
minus-squareParaponera_clavata@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agoTo me, the dataset and topic look so open-ended, and the dataset looks designed for people to mix random effects in many different ways. All this study does is highlight the lack of hypothetico deductive reasoning in so much research these days. It’s also gross that nature is writing articles on pre prints, IMHO
To me, the dataset and topic look so open-ended, and the dataset looks designed for people to mix random effects in many different ways.
All this study does is highlight the lack of hypothetico deductive reasoning in so much research these days.
It’s also gross that nature is writing articles on pre prints, IMHO