As the global reputation of US brands slips, some US firms are turning to unusual marketing strategies. Coca-Cola, for instance, is now promoting itself as a "German product."
It’s not correct in this case. Which is also easily researchable on the internet.
Coca-Cola in Germany is bottled in many different plants locally, by the biggest Coca-Cola bottling company worldwide. It is a british company licensing the use of the brand and name from the US Coca-Cola company, but a separate entity.
That is something different from processed and packaged, which you talked about in your first comment.
Of course not, most ingredients however will be EU produced/processed and then processed into the final drinks in Germany.
But aside from pure agricultural product, almost no product would be “product of Germany” if using no imports would be the requirement to use that lable.
Then you didn’t read my comment carefully, because my point is that ONLY a product that is ENTIRELY produced in a single country should be marketed as such.
It’s not correct in this case. Which is also easily researchable on the internet.
Coca-Cola in Germany is bottled in many different plants locally, by the biggest Coca-Cola bottling company worldwide. It is a british company licensing the use of the brand and name from the US Coca-Cola company, but a separate entity.
So all the ingredients are produced in Germany too?
That is something different from processed and packaged, which you talked about in your first comment.
Of course not, most ingredients however will be EU produced/processed and then processed into the final drinks in Germany.
But aside from pure agricultural product, almost no product would be “product of Germany” if using no imports would be the requirement to use that lable.
Then you didn’t read my comment carefully, because my point is that ONLY a product that is ENTIRELY produced in a single country should be marketed as such.
All the rest is pure marketing lies.