• macniel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    158
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    in 1999 you had the ability to get into a music shop, load the cd and test listen to it. Or just go through the music charts. Or wish for a specific song on radio.

    Also 1999 already had Napster, Morpheus and others.

      • enkers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then you keep listening to it anyways, and it slowly becomes one of your favourite albums of all time.

      • errer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Did you miss the whole “you could test listen to the CD in the shop” part?

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Also standing there for 45 minutes to listen to the entire thing? Who actually does that?

            Me. It was me. I was 14. I listened to the whole thing. I think the name of the store was “The Warehouse” and maybe another was called “Good Guys”? But yeah. Both. I’d take the bus to the mall and sit on that raggedy ass carpet that smelled like a movie theater floor and listened to the whole damn album. All of them actually (usually like 6-8 per station?) until the manager told me to leave. A couple times clerks would hook me up with burned demos.

            But yeah. It was me.

          • explodicle@local106.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re not wrong, but there were definitely people who spent tons of time listening to music at the record store.

          • Franconian_Nomad@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            There were actual listening stations with headphones here in Germany at certain media chains. Some people spent whole afternoons in there.

            But yeah, the opposite did exist. I remember, when I was a teenager friends got a dozen or more CDs for their birthday. Good old 1998.

    • Gurfaild@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the 2000s, some electronics stores where I lived had “jukeboxes” with headphones and a barcode scanner, so you could listen to 30-second snippets of the songs on an album before buying it.

    • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m old enough to know the pencil trick to fix a cassette that got eaten by the stereo…

      • Dharma Curious@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I still keep a pencil in my car. I know there’s no cassette to play, but my car feels naked with a pencil rolling around the center console or in the little tray on the dash.

          • Lileath@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It was less that we were poor and more that my parents had a lot of music and radio dramas on different media. My father still has more than two hundred vinyl disks that he plays semiregularly and I have an old audio tape player/recorder sitting around in my bedroom although I don’t really use that one.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also 1999 already had Napster

      Only half of it, apparently! I just looked it up to check, and it turns out it launched on June 1 of that year.

    • Thelsim@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      God, I miss test listens. My favorite record store was very easy going in this, they’d happily let me stand there listening to most of the CD. The unspoken rule was that if you spend that much time listening, you’re going to buy it anyway.
      One of the few shops where I always felt welcome.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Never saw a music shop with a communal CD player that allowed you to remove the CD shrink wrap.

  • RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You buy a Sony CD and decide to play it on your computer.

    Your computer now has a rootkit installed.

    • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And these days people just install the rootkit, only it’s allegedly to prevent game cheating.

      • hackris@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        And, when called out, everyone tells you you’re a paranoid, tinfoil hat wearing, organ trafficking criminal

        • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s because you guys throw around the word “rootkit” like my parents call everything “woke” or “communist.”

          You probably couldn’t even define what a rootkit is yet you’re scared shitless of a thing you can’t properly define.

          So yeah, anyone who’s afraid of something they don’t even understand fully is absolutely paranoid.

          • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Most people are not fully cognizant of the rights they sign away in a click through. There is paranoid and there is prudent.

            • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Read the EULA, if you don’t want an anticheat that requires those permissions then don’t install the game.

              Something having kernel access doesn’t make it a rootkit, it makes it high-risk for misuse by a threat actor. Only if the software was exploited by a bad actor to acquire root/hardware permissions would this issue actually become something.

              That, or if the anticheat wasn’t uninstallable and/or dodged scans intended to locate it, etc.

              • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Putting the responsibility to understand legalese (and advanced concepts like rootkits) to such an extent on the end user is just straight gaslighting. Nobody has the required expertise to determine what an EULA actually says outside of the lawyer who wrote it, and even then, I wouldn’t guarantee it.

          • voxel@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            well the game installs a kernel module without my consent. Isn’t that the definition of a rootkit?

            • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Did you install a game with anticheat? Did that anticheat require kernel level access? Can you read?

              I’m just curious what part is them sneaking something onto your machine that you’re unaware of?

              • hackris@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                I have no idea if the gamers installing it are “unaware” (I never played such a game), however it’s still a shitty practice. The average Joe has no idea what the hell a rootkit is and it’s predatory to exploit this. Also, no game should install rootkits. For the love of god, it’s a videogame.

                • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No game is installing rootkits, you guys just keep misusing the term, as I’ve attempted to explain like five fucking times in this thread.

                  The average joe clearly doesn’t understand what a rootkit is, as you’ve well established.

              • voxel@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                most anticheats run in the kernel, even the most popular ones like battleye and vanguard.
                also they are often installed automatically while launching games for the first time, without any prompts

      • voxel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        yeah maybe just design proper authoritative servers instead?
        anticheats are kinda a band-aid solution.

          • voxel@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            slef hosted servers don’t solve cheating on their own either.
            proper authoritive server shouldn’t send or accept any information that isn’t strictly necessary, like positions of players that are in a completely different part of the map

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      “most people who had the rootkit installed on their machine dont know what a rootkit is anyways; why should I care?”

      -sony’s response

    • explodicle@local106.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      I STILL don’t buy Sony shit because of that. They booby trapped their product and idiots still buy it. There are plenty of competitors who don’t do that.

  • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    i’m curious now

    usually censorship is used to replace a strong word with a milder one, or to change the meaning of the text

    what word in this meme was so egregious that OP saw fit to replace it with “fucking”

    • noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      1999 piracy mostly consisted of paying for a pirated copy that someone decided to make profit off; most likely, they weren’t the person to make the (first!) copy, and they’re not even sure what’s on the thing they were selling you. It was mostly bootlegging.

        • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I think maybe he meant before 1999. Before Napster(99)/limewire(2000)/morpheus(2001) pirating was bootlegged shit you paid (less) for. But yeah after 99 you got that shit for free on the internet.

          • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Most people were still buying CDs in 99. In ‘99, $10 for an album would have been a pretty sweet price. Tower Records, Best Buy cds were all like $17.99

      • Confuzzeled@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        When I was a kid we still recorded stuff off the radio and copied our zx spectrum games on the family hi-fi. I’d say good times but it’s so much better now I can pirate everything in great quality from teh interwebs.

      • Selmafudd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        My memory is a little fuzzy with dates but I’m pretty sure Napster was going full steam by '99 but even before that we used to trade mp3 files on mIRC or ICQ+CuteFTP, I had hundreds of albums I never paid for which I am still amazed I managed to do over a shared 56k connection

      • Getawombatupya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Like buying a game CD and a warez copy bypass and the crew doing an ASCII art walk through, bought for $5 from a classmate

        Or shareware floppy disks with copyright bypass

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the pre-Internet early 90s, CDs were $15-25 (with inflation, about $40 now)…. And for a lot of music, you had no way of hearing it first. Shoplifting was popular.

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For real… I never had this problem before… Currently I’m a proud Spotify user.

    • dolle@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      So much this! I don’t use Spotify, I buy all my music on Bandcamp. Sometimes I buy an album after just hearing the first song because I find it interesting, but then after a few more listens I realize that the album is not what I thought it was. However, I’m already committed because I paid for it, and it now sits at the top of my collection, so I continue to listen to it. Sometimes it turns out I find qualities in the music that I didn’t notice at the first listen, and I learn to like it. Sometimes not, and I ditch it.

      This was also the way I discovered music before Spotify even existed, I just never changed my habits (I just used other services than Bandcamp back then). I think more people should try turning off the algorithmic entertainment faucet that is Spotify and try committing a bit more to the music that they listen to. Also, a lot more money goes to the artists this way, Spotify is basically stealing from the artists.

      • spiderman@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I buy all my music on Bandcamp.

        How much have you spent on buying albums in Bandcamp? It must be a lot if Bandcamp is the your only choice for listening to music.

        • dolle@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have 170 albums in my Bandcamp collection. I have a lot more on my mp3 collection which I have bought via other means. Each album is maybe $10 on average, so that is around $1700. I have used Bandcamp for around 8 years after 7digital closed their EU store and eMusic became trash. So that’s around $17 per month. Not a lot of money in my book, music means a lot to me!

          • spiderman@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Okay, that’s a large collection. I am more interested to buy vinyl these days but they are too expensive here.

  • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Conversely, you buy a CD from a band you’ve never heard of just because you like the album art or maybe even the title or the band name, and you find out it’s a god damn masterpiece from start to finish. This is how I discovered Audioslave almost 20 years ago and it’s the best $14 I ever spent. I still have the disc btw and it still plays perfectly.

  • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it’s 1999, you would go to a record store if you wanted to buy an album and depending on the store the would have a sampler disk and could tell you if it sucked or not. Also, if the songs where good you would have billboard to tell you how good it was as well as your local radio station.

    Or you could just open Napster and download the whole album for free.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I like how this is pretending that the internet didn’t exist in 1999 because there was no Spotify or iTunes.

  • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah except in 1999 you could go to Sam Goody or The Warehouse or whatever, and listen to the album in the store before buying, especially if it was a new release.

    Personally, I was going to the public library and checking out it CDs from there.

    • Polar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      $20 CAD gets you a family plan that you can share up to 5 people, so $4 CAD each.

      Not sure what you’re on about. If you’re paying $20 for Spotify you’re getting ripped off.

      Or you can pay $25 CAD for YouTube Premium, share it with 5 people, and get both YouTube ad free AND YouTube Music for $5 CAD per month.

      I’d rather pay $4/$5 per month to access millions of songs than $20 for an album that I will get bored of in a few months, thanks.

  • Demuniac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    You would rarely buy random cd’s or whatnot. You would hear one or 2 songs on the radio, or from a friend, or you already loved the artist. You’d loan it from the library, or spend 30 min listening to it in the store.

    Then you would come home and set it on repeat for weeks. Even the tracks on the CD that were less good, you would appreciate.

    I definitely preferred how much I cared for the music back then a lot more. Even pre-Napster.

    • Rehwyn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yup. I seem to remember most mainstream albums were around $15-20 in the 1990s. Adjusted for inflation, that’d be about $28-37 today.

      • tpihkal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think any CD I ever wanted enough to buy was less than $16. My family was poor so cassette tapes were still a thing for quite a while.

        By the time I could start thinking about affording CDs, I’d already seen the movie Hackers (1994) and was convinced everything would be digital really fucking fast.

        I started converting my CDs in the Napster era.

        • enthusiasticamoeba@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I only had a handful of CDs because they were too expensive! I jumped on the napster train and got a CD burner as soon as I could.