• kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    20 hours ago

    They must have overshot, then. Computers are 100% efficient space heaters that produce math as a byproduct.

    • copd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      in the uk price per kWh for electricity is over five times cost of natural gas. We all use natural gas boilers to heat water which flows through radiators to warm our rooms. Anybody who heats their house with space heaters is just throwing money away whether it’s 100% efficient or not.

      You see more heatpumps these days but that’s another thing entirely

      • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Heat pumps cap out at about 250% 400% efficiency, so you’d still be spending more to run them than to burn natural gas at that ratio.

        • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Heat pumps easily exceed 2.5 COP. More like 4 in the UK climate. And gas isn’t 100% efficient either. But yeah it’s a wash or can be more expensive to heat with heat pumps where electricity is really expensive. It helps if we all conveniently ignore externalities like pollution and carbon too.

          • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Thanks for the correction, edited. How is gas not 100% efficient, though?

            But yeah, heat pumps are definitely more environmentally friendly (unless you’re habitually letting the refrigerant out, o guess). The real argument is whether the extra energy is worth it for protein folding (I’d say generally no, but if you don’t have a heat pump, might as well).