Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron on Thursday released a written order detailing why he determined Donald Trump’s Wednesday sworn testimony denying that he attacked a court clerk “rings hollow and untrue” after he fined the former president $10,000 for his second violation of a partial gag order meant to protect courtroom staff.

The former president had claimed on the witness stand that he had been referring to his former lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen as the “partisan” sitting “alongside” Engoron when he spoke to reporters outside the courtroom on Wednesday. But the judge was unconvinced, deeming that excuse “not credible.”

“Witnesses do not sit ‘alongside’ the judge, they sit in the witness box, separated from the judge by a low wooden barrier,” Engoron wrote in the order, obtained by The Messenger. “Further, Donald Trump’s past public statements demonstrate him referring to Michael Cohen directly by his name, or by a derogatory name, but in all circumstances, he is unambiguous in making it known he is referring to Michael Cohen.”

He added: “Using imprecise language as an excuse to create plausible ambiguity about whether defendant violated this Court’s unequivocal gag order is not a defense; the subject of Donald Trump’s public statement to the press was unmistakably clear.”

  • stopthatgirl7@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    but this Judge and his ‘boss,’ Letitia Peekaboo James

    He just had to get that borderline racist little dig in, didn’t he.

    • RazorsLedge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      39
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s racist here? Is peekaboo racist? Isn’t that just the word you tell children before you surprise them?

          • numbermess@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s just a slur. It doesn’t really have any great meaning. It’s kind of like calling somebody a shithead. Do they really have shit on their head, or is it really made out of shit? Probably not, but that’s not the important part of the message. The important part is the accusation, and that’s about all it means. Like the word woke, it doesn’t really mean anything, but everybody who uses it as an accusation is pretty sure what they mean by it. Everybody who would call a black person a jiggaboo (or cleverly cloak it in “peekaboo”) is the same. It has no meaning, but they all agree on what it means to them.

        • RazorsLedge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I saw that comment, but didn’t know where they were getting “jigaboo” from, nor had I ever heard of “jigaboo” or what it meant. But thanks for trying to help. I think I get it now, after one of the other responses.