HelloSlowly@alien.topB to Hardware@hardware.watchEnglish · 1 year agoApple officially unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max: 3 nanometer, Dynamic Caching GPU, more9to5mac.comexternal-linkmessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down10cross-posted to: hardware@lemmit.onlineapple@lemmit.onlineapple@hardware.watchtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up13arrow-down1external-linkApple officially unveils M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max: 3 nanometer, Dynamic Caching GPU, more9to5mac.comHelloSlowly@alien.topB to Hardware@hardware.watchEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square44fedilinkcross-posted to: hardware@lemmit.onlineapple@lemmit.onlineapple@hardware.watchtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.ml
minus-squareReipasTietokonePoju@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoAbout pure CPU rendering, Mac vs. PeeCee, it is really simple; AMD 7950x in 105W “ECO MODE” (!!!) gets exactly same result in Cinebech 24 (multi-core) benchmark … than fastest, most expensive M2 Ultra Mac. 3000 euros for decent 7950 box, 128 GB, 4 TB etc. Most expensive Mac M2 Ultra, same 128 GB 4 TB setup -> about 6900 euros. Ryzen 7950 vs current M2 Max, Ryzen is 100% faster; https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/cpu_benchmark-cinebench_2024_multi_core
About pure CPU rendering, Mac vs. PeeCee, it is really simple;
AMD 7950x in 105W “ECO MODE” (!!!) gets exactly same result in Cinebech 24 (multi-core) benchmark
… than fastest, most expensive M2 Ultra Mac.
3000 euros for decent 7950 box, 128 GB, 4 TB etc.
Most expensive Mac M2 Ultra, same 128 GB 4 TB setup -> about 6900 euros.
Ryzen 7950 vs current M2 Max, Ryzen is 100% faster;
https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/cpu_benchmark-cinebench_2024_multi_core