In one Canadian town, the issue is whether the parking space becomes a space for anyone, or whether it is reserved for a charger technician. No rule on this is written and one has to guess. What do you think?

  • betanumerus@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I precisely explained why it’s ambiguous. Everything is based on the assumption of a functioning charger. Without that, everything falls apart, the sign, everything.

    • prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s not ambiguity, that’s you willfully misinterpreting a definitive statement.

      I don’t know what the sign that you parked at said, because you haven’t told us. I do know that you’re arguing against literally everyone in this thread trying (unsuccessfully) to get anyone to agree with you. Based on that, I’m guessing the problem wasn’t with the signage.

      • betanumerus@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I’m asking for opinions, not playground insults. You’re ok with parking twice if a charger is broken and that’s fine with me. I don’t think that wasted time should be on you (and everyone else later that day, week, month, etc.), and I don’t think a prime parking space should be left unusable indefinitely. But you do you.