Normally when people think of man watches they think of large stuff. Even some Bauhaus ones despite thin are rather large, thinking of Junghans for example.

But if like me your wrist is more on the small side, I think smaller watches definitely look better. Stuff like Vintage Omega, Longines be it new or vintage, Timex or any brands that can deliver smaller sizes.

With this being said I have to admit sometimes I’ve considered wearing “women’s” watches precisely due to this. Is that acceptable?

Concluding all this I’d just like to say I obviously hate Diesel watches

  • Smiths_fan137@alien.topOPBEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    It’s not… hate, it’s more just like “wouldn’t wear on my wrist nor own”. That’s a great point but you got the overall idea.

    I keep getting recommended large and chunky like, you know, huge watches that look almost like having a whole car wheel on the wrist in proportion to my small-medium wrists and it only happens because “oh he’s a man. Surely he will like how manly these look!”. No I actually don’t.

    Yes absolutely there’s many brands out there delivering smaller sizes…and I find myself realizing Longines has a great selection of small-medium sized watches as well as Timex, Rolex even or Omega or Swatch

    But when I use my small watches I sometimes do get asked why I’m using a feminine watch…and it is annoying

    • tomahawk66mtb@alien.topBEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      Yes, watch shops tend to have this default “man big, woman small” mentality. My friend happens to look awesome wearing big watches and she has a number including a Panerai Luminor (they tried to sell her a Due but the bigger one looked better on her) and a Breitling Navitimer 41 among others. She’s a very slender, quite tall model build but has quite flat wrists so they all look awesome on her. On the other hand, I was looking at Reverso’s today and the the smaller, more traditional ones looked way better on me, even with my 7.5" wrist.