This has never stuck with me, and I hadn’t thought about why until now. I have two reasons why I will always write ${x}_$y.z instead of ${x}_${y}.z:
Syntax highlighting and shellcheck have always caught the cases I need to add braces to prevent $x_ being expanded as ${x_}.
I write a lot of Zsh. In Zsh, braces are optional in way more cases. "$#array[3]" actually prints the length of the third item in array, rather than (Bash:) the number of positional parameters, then the string 'array[3]'.
My reply is to a commenter who said they prefer "${HOME}/docs" over both options in the original image ("$HOME/docs" or "$HOME"/docs). Many people prefer to always include braces around the parameter name out of consistency, instead of only when they are required.
My comment explained why my habit is to only include braces when they are necessary.
@zephyr
echo "${HOME}/docs"
This is the best way. It’s also the way the Shellcheck
wantssometimes recommends.This isn’t true. Shellcheck doesn’t insist on braces unless it thinks you need them.
This has never stuck with me, and I hadn’t thought about why until now. I have two reasons why I will always write
${x}_$y.z
instead of${x}_${y}.z
:$x_
being expanded as${x_}
."$#array[3]"
actually prints the length of the third item inarray
, rather than (Bash:) the number of positional parameters, then the string'array[3]'
.The difference between the two seems different to what’s in the OP. Is there a typo here?
My reply is to a commenter who said they prefer
"${HOME}/docs"
over both options in the original image ("$HOME/docs"
or"$HOME"/docs
). Many people prefer to always include braces around the parameter name out of consistency, instead of only when they are required.My comment explained why my habit is to only include braces when they are necessary.