• godhandk@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Over this whole high school drama saga. Let the guy move if that’s what he wants, especially if the manager refuses to play him and move on. Best and probably only chance at a career revival also.

    • staycoolwilson@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why should united pay his wages while he plays for another club? If he wants a career revival he can take a drop in wages or apologise to the manager.

      • NOLA-Gunner@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why would a potential club pay him what you lot are paying him? Since they won’t, why would Sancho agree to the move to lose money.

        So you’ll either pay him the full amount to do nothing, and pay a fraction of it for him to play elsewhere

        • Round-Mud@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We have no obligation to pay him to play somewhere else. If he wants to not play any football for two years he is more than welcome to. But if he wants to play football again then he better find a club to pay him or take a pay cut. Because we aren’t paying him money to play for Juventus.

      • dmastra97@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They wouldn’t be paying all his wages right? So it’s a decrease in costs for them

        • ANON_YMOUSE_@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          why would they choose that over selling him or loaning him with full wages paid?

          they want rid, getting rid of the person but still paying him doesnt benefit the team whatsoever. For example. I dont know the % theyre being asked to cover but 50% of Sanchos wage is still more than 80% of players in the league.

          • beartigerhawk8383@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why would anyone pay Jadon what you guys pay him? I think you guys are stuck with his wages until the contract runs out. If anyone takes him it will be on a loan with the majority of wages paid by you. At this point it’s more realistic that ETH is sacked before the end of the season and Jadon can come and play next season.

            • ANON_YMOUSE_@alien.topB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              There is also no reason to pay for sancho whilst he plays for another team when we have a terrible squad depth, if were going to pay for him, were going to make sure he is an option in the event we need him, but will sell him/loan him if it benefits us

              ETH likely wont be sacked, they will see him out to the end of the season at least i think

      • Some-Speed-6290@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why should Sancho apologise to someone who publicly mocked his mental health issues and continually supports and shows favouritism to Antony despite his repeated abuse of women?

    • CrossXFir3@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. We need to have a hard stance on this. He either finds a club that’ll pay or he sits in the reserves. We keep doing this. We keep using the same excuses. There needs to be a point where we take the hit and stop other clubs from taking advantage of us. We need to start rebuilding our reputation on the market.

    • SpicyDragoon93@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes but we take cash and get him out quickly, no more of this loaning out to pay his wages only for him to do slightly better, come back in and continue or leaving for damn near nothing. We should look to Alexis Sanchez as an example we should not repeat.

    • Exaris1989@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am a bit torn on that decision. On one hand Sancho deserves to be benched either until his contract runs out or until someone buys him, he doesn’t deserve to play at other club while United pays part of his wages. On other hand, sending him away for half a year may help to sell him in the summer and will remove his negative influence over other players (if there is one).