• Meadows14@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like people are trying to math a way to the Rams losing this trade. They won a Super Bowl, they won the trade. The Lions also won the trade.

    • erica_638@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Rams got a ring. The Lions got substantial tools to rebuild and are currently threatening to take the NFC one-seed.

      There are no losers in this trade.

    • SaddiqBae@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s literally this easy, the rams did not make that move with long term in mind, they wanted to win that year and they did. It worked. Lions wanted to rebuild and it set the rebuild up perfectly. I don’t think either side is disappointed with how it’s turned out. Rams knew very well this would happen a couple of years after.

      • tandemtactics@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is how trades are literally supposed to work. If you aren’t contending for championships right now, trade your aging high-value assets in exchange for pieces to rebuild. If you ARE contending for championships, sell out your future for pieces to win immediately. Worked out perfectly for both sides.

      • Khal-Stevo@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Any Rams fans who act like we lost this trade are just exposing themselves as the most Laker fans of all Lakers fans and don’t know what it’s like to watch a team that doesn’t win all the time

      • CrashBandicoot2@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Call it naivete if you want, but the Rams thought the trade was good for both the present (2021 season) and the long term. The present is obvious, but they felt they had a guy they’d get many good years from in Stafford and that they were only a QB away. They had been dealing away high picks (while quietly accumulating late picks) for years and the system stayed sustainable so they figured they could keep it going. Things falling apart in 2022 was not according to plan though to be fair, no one thought the Rams would collapse like that before the season started. This year, moves were made in a reaction to 2022 to rebuil–err–“re-tool”. But even then, the idea has been Stafford is our long term QB and we’ll be a contender again in 2024 with all our picks and a lot of open cap space. You can call some of that delusional, but that’s been the thinking from this team.

        • SaddiqBae@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I believe it, just unlikely they’ll be able to contend with such an aging roster. But again, they got the super bowl, I’d say it was a success even if they win less than 5 games each of the next 5 years lol

          • CrashBandicoot2@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah I’m not sure how much I agree with some of the post-championship decisions the team has made, but everything is worth it because we won the Super Bowl. Really hoping you guys get yours. Would love it for Lions fans and would love it for Goff.

      • 69thwonder@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Stop it with this rational take of yours! We need a sexy headline and somebody has to be a loser of the trade!

    • Kershiser22@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the Rams got exactly what they were hoping for. So win for them.

      I think the Lions have probably gotten more out of Goff than they expected. So win for them, with the possibility that he can still take the team to at least a conference championship in the next year or two.

    • _mdz@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seriously, i’d give up the next 20 years of Falcons football for a Super Bowl, as would most other non-spoiled teams (ie. Patriots).

    • CasualRead_43@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Correct. I remember morons on podcasts saying if the rams lost the Super Bowl they would have lost the trade which is equally stupid but there’s no way the rams lose the trade with a ring. And lions are gaining ground every week cuz of how Goff plays.

    • siberiansneaks@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a Lions fan, Agree. Stafford was never going to win a SB in Detroit, and Goffs situation in LA was going to just get more toxic. This worked for both parties. Everyone is happy.

      If the Lions can win a Super Bowl and contend for other years, could probably make the statement they win the trade as it appears Rams are one and done.

      But Super Bowl > Anything