Goodreads has launched the opening round for their yearly awards for the best books just recently. I skimmed through the categories myself, yet already saw quite mixed reviews about the suggestions for this year’s nominees.

Some categories like poetry and children books were removed (yeah, you can say that children ain’t a target audience for the Goodreads yet this platform always seemed to be well rounded).

Graphic novels is also something that was removed unfortunately. Although these ain’t my cup of tea, I’m almost sure it must be upsetting for a large group of people.

  • Zikoris@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My policy is that if I’ve only read one book in a category, I don’t vote in that category unless I thought the book was just amazing. Ideally I like to have at least four in a category.

    • TemperatureRough7277@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You have to be such a specific type of reader to achieve this though (prolific and reading almost exclusively new releases). I read over 100 books a year but a ton of that is backlist so I am lucky to have read six or seven titles across all categories.

      • Zikoris@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Prolific, yes, exclusively new releases, no, if you’re prolific enough. I read 23 on the list so far, out of 346 total books so far, and I do still plan to read two more before the voting ends (Bookshops and Bonedust, and System Collapse, both on hold at the library).

        You could also be medium-prolific and get a lot of hits if you mostly read specific genres.