Often when I read ML papers the authors compare their results against a benchmark (e.g. using RMSE, accuracy, …) and say “our results improved with our new method by X%”. Nobody makes a significance test if the new method Y outperforms benchmark Z. Is there a reason why? Especially when you break your results down e.g. to the anaylsis of certain classes in object classification this seems important for me. Or do I overlook something?

    • iswedlvera@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I see what you mean. Yeah it shouldn’t be by default I don’t do statistical significance tests.