Often when I read ML papers the authors compare their results against a benchmark (e.g. using RMSE, accuracy, …) and say “our results improved with our new method by X%”. Nobody makes a significance test if the new method Y outperforms benchmark Z. Is there a reason why? Especially when you break your results down e.g. to the anaylsis of certain classes in object classification this seems important for me. Or do I overlook something?
Depends on how big the individual samples are tbh. 1000 samples of 10 people actually sounds like a decent study group
I see what you mean. Yeah it shouldn’t be by default I don’t do statistical significance tests.