• OrionsTieClip@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like the number of people that care about being able to drive a display faster than 4k 120hz is rather small, bit weird to dunk on NVIDIA for that

    • Firefox72@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It might be nieche for now but Nvidia skimping out on it in their 4000 series was just weird given the price of these products.

      • OrionsTieClip@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I personally care about the shit VRAM. I do ML research, and anything except the 3090 and maybe the 12 gb cards is stupid.

    • ranixon@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Expensive cards will be connected to expensive monitors, and expensive monitors like the Samsung Neo G9 uses this connector

    • VIRT22@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a correlation between NVIDIA adapting a new tech standard and the number of monitors makers offering products that support it since GeForce is market leader.

      The 4090 can easily push 4K 240Hz in lighter games if paired with high-end CPUs without DSC and full 10-bit.