Before diving in, I just want to wish everyone a nice holiday week, and safe travels to all those doing so.
NFL 2023 - Offensive Line Rankings
If you are interested in the Math & Methodology just keep reading, or for even more: NFL 2023 - Comparative Offensive Line Ratings
If you are math adverse and just want to read the team offensive line capsules (all the charts and data are still there if you wish to review them): NFL 2023 - Offensive Line Rankings
TLDR: Just look at the last 2 columns on the main chart posted below.
Example Offensive Line Capsule
NY Giants Offensive Line Capsule
The Role & Metrics of the Offensive Line
For the offensive line ratings, we are going to assume that the offensive line’s 4 main objectives are:
- Open holes for the rushing game
- Identify, adjust and negate blitzes
- Protect the quarterback for a reasonable amount of time
- Win & hold blocks as a unit
In addition, like any other player or unit on the field, they should accomplish this without drawing fouls. Since this is basically a given for all units/players, I won’t list it as a main objective, but offensive lines will be scored on their ability to avoid costly penalties.
The List of Offensive Line Metrics
- Rushing Yards Before Contact x 2
- Blitz %
- Pressure %
- Blitz Deflection %
- Average Pocket Time
- Sack %
- Estimated Penalty Yards
- Overall Block Win%
Let’s look at each objective and identify the metric(s) used to measure the line’s effectiveness.
Opening Holes For The Rushing Game
Clearly one of the offensive line’s main tasks is to run block effectively. An offensive line that cannot run block and create opportunities for ball carriers is going to find itself forced into a lot of predictable pass block situations. Without the threat of an effective running game, defensive players can sit on pass routes and pass rushers can pin their ears back.
The metric to be used to measure run block effectiveness is Rushing Yards Before Contact(YBC), and this will be the only rushing metric used… While the ball carrier’s ability is certainly a part of the metric, the size of the hole, or the time until the first defender can make contact with a ball carrier, is primarily a result of blocking. And while wide receivers and tight end blocking is also a factor, we can simply assume that all wr/te blocks are equal(which they surely are not), and assume these blocks are simply an extension of the line blocking(or that the wr/te in the play assume linemen status for the play).
Because the run game can in and of itself win ball games, and an effective run game compliments an effective pass game, the value of this metric will be doubled(the score each line receives for this metric is multiplied by two). Thus the score you see in the Standardized YBC column is the sd value, and the next column shows the YBC score(its SD value * 2).
Pivot tables were needed to sum up totals like every players that has rushed the ball for each time to calculate YBC. You will see more of them below.
Identifying, Adjust To, And Negate Blitzes
This is probably the most difficult and important task assigned to the offensive line. Before providing time for a quarterback to throw, the line must identify the pass rushers, call the line protection, and still be aware of any misidentifications or additional blitzers not accounted for pre-snap. If any of this goes wrong without a blitz, it can lead to a negative play. When it goes wrong with a blitz, the potential for disasterous outcomes rises significantly.
We are going to assign three metrics to measuring this task:
Blitz % - An offensive line that faces a high amount of blitzing will score more higher in this metric. The purpose of this metric is to measure the amount of blitzes the line has had to face while producing the stats it has. It should be clear that a line facing 30% blitz % who gave up just 5 sacks, is probably more effective than a line who faced a 15% blitz % and gave up 5 sacks. Either the blitz pickup of the latter line is not good OR they are getting beat without a blitz.
Pressure % - Pressure % is simply the amount of hurries, knockdowns and sacks as a cumulative total, changed into a percentage by dividing that sum by the amount of pass attempts, scrambles & sacks. It assigns equal weight to a knockdown, a hurry and a sack even though they each have different Expected Point values, and affects on down/distance/outcome.
For measuring purposes, offensive lines that allow the least amount of pressure will score highest.
Blitz Deflection % - This is a metric you have never heard of because I just made it up. I am defining Blitz Deflection % as [1 - (Pressure % / Blitz %)]. Let’s look at a simple example of what it is and why it may be a valuable metric.
Let’s assume a line has faced a Blitz % of 25%. Let’s also assume, that every blitz leads directly to pressure. Thus a Blitz % of 25% should lead to a Pressure % of 25%. Essentially, blitzes always work. Thus if a team faces 25% Blitzes, then the average line would allow 25% pressure.
A line that could keep pressure % BELOW Blitz % would be doing a better job than a line who’s Pressure % was higher than their Blitz %. If this happens the line must be giving up pressure outside the Blitz and negating little to none of the blitzes sent.
Looking at the chart, Baltimore’s offensive line has faced the blitz on 30.68% of designed passing plays. Their pressure % is a mere 14.49%. While this cannot show the exact breakdown of how often Baltimore’s offensive line picked up the blitz and how many time they allowed pressure without a blitz, it should be obvious that line is picking up blitzes.
The ratio [1 - (14.49% / 30.68%)] = 52.78%. Thus Baltimore’s offensive line is deflecting 52.78% of blitzes.
Conversely, let’s take a look at Pittsburgh’s offensive line in this metric. The Steelers Offensive line faces a blitz 18.08% of the time(by far the lowest % in the league, Cincinnati is second least blitzed at 21.61%). However the Steeler offensive line allows a pressure % of 25.32%.
The ratio [1-(25.32 / 18.08%)] = -40.35%. The Steeler’s line is not deflecting any blitzes and giving up pressure outside of being blitzed.
Just remember Blitz Deflection is not measuring the actual amount of blitz pickups, but the theoretical amount a line is negating blitzes.
Protect the Quarterback for a Reasonable Amount of Time
Regardless as to whether the blitz pickup has been identified and executed properly, the offensive line is still tasked with giving the quarterback enough time to go through his reads and complete the passing motion. It would be great if the qb is still standing and in the pocket when this is completed, but sometimes things go wrong and quarterbacks get sacked.
The two metrics being used in this portion of the offensive line ratings are fairly straightforward.
Average Time in The Pocket - The amount of time the quarterback has before contact or being flushed is average time in the pocket. It should follow that allowing more time for the quarterback would be good, and allowing less time bad.
This is a bit of scheming that plays into this as some times have an extremely quick read system that inherently gets the ball out faster than other schemes looking for deeper, or double, routes. But it is a fairly reliable indicator on the ability of the line to pass protect and form a workable qb pocket.
Sack % - Sacks are the worst kind of pressure as they come with loss of down and yardage by the very definition of a sack. This is an inverse metric in that it is better to have a lower sack % than a higher one. Lines that allow a lower % of sack will score well, while porous lines will score poorly.
Minimize Penalties
Another metric in measuring offensive lines will be their ability to avoid getting in their own way. Every penalty on each individual line is collected and the entire line is responsible for the total penalties.
Pivot table summarizing every lineman’s penalties for each team
For estimating penalty yardage, a false start is 5 yards, holding and any other penalty is 10 yards(the other penalties are a mix of 5 yard and 15 yard infractions, thus I decided to use 10 yards as the punishement for each. Offsetting and declined penalties are still counted. Multiplying out the types of penalties and the estimated yardage for each results in an estimated total penalty yardage total for each offensive line. This is also an inverse metric. Lines that have been penalized the most will score poorly, while the mistake free lines will score high.
Winning Blocks - Overall Offensive Line Blocking Win Rate
The final metric is another metric you may not have seen before, Overall Block Win Rate. To calculate this metric, ESPN’s Pass Blocking Win Rate and Rush Blocking Win Rate percentages were used for each team(which just so happened to be published this week).
Then the breakdown between passing and running plays for each team were taken into account. To find the overall block win rate, the pass block win rate was multiplied by the passing play %, and the rush block win rate was multiplied by the rush play %. Turning the resulting metric back into a percentage, leads to overall block win rate.
For example, a team has a pass block win rate of 60% and a rush block win rate of 70%. They pass 60% of the time and run 40% of the time. What is the overall block win %?
Overall Block Win % = [(0.60*60)+(0.70*40)]/100 = 64%
You can see all the data and calculation in the main chart. Perhaps you think everything before this section is nonsense and overall block win rate % is the true measure of offensive lines. In that case, here is the ranking based solely on Overall Block Win Rate %
Overall Block Win Rate when pass/run ratio is factored in.
Final Offensive Line Ratings & Rankings
Summing up the score from the 8 metrics(and doubling the YBC value), we arrive at a final rating for each of the 32 offensive lines. Like any rating system there are sure to be disagreements and niggles in the methodology.
The Offensive Line Ratings see Baltimore, Philadelphia, Miami, & the LA Rams as the having the best offensive lines. It sees Houston, Pittsburgh, Carolina, and the extremely woeful NY Giants as having the worst performing offensive lines thus far in 2023.
Titans ranked 31st by PFF, 21st by you. Not that PFF is the bible, but the eye test strongly favors their methodology. You’ve gotta clean up weightings or something because there isn’t a chance in hell the Titans aren’t bottom 5 in the NFL. Bottom 3 is more likely.
I think we may be arguing levels of bad here but let’s dissect the Titans metrics. Just looking at a final score doesn’t tell the full story.
The Titans get their scoring from five metrics
Blitz% - they have been blitzed the second most often behind the Colts
Penalties - The don’t commit many
Avg Pocket time - 2.51, which is quite good.
Overall block win rate is 64% which is above average
Blitz deflection is just a smidge above average.
On the flip side
Their YBC is below average
Their sack % and pressure% are even worse, near or at bottom.
So they are facing a lot of blitzing but still allowing for significantly above average time in pocket. They deal with blitzes about average(blitz deflection), but even with more than average time, the qb is being pressured and sacked. This would point more towards the quarterback than the line.
They don’t create a huge amount running lanes for the rush game. This is on the line, but they are not really abyssmal in this, just below average.
Conclusion - the lack of penalties is probably helping them in this system, but their passing woes may be more on the qb than on the line. Their overall block win rate is above average and there are just at least a half dozen other lines that are definitively worse when comparing them to Tennessee.
I can’t say I have watched every Titans game like a Titans fan, so I could be way off base, but this is what the stats are saying when comparing them to other offensive lines.
Every day I get more proof that the Ravens are the best team in the league
Super Bowl XLVII rematch incoming
Andrews injury is going to be hard for them to overcome, and Lamar is taking a beating the last few weeks. Not impossible, but I’m not seeing it.
This is interesting and I wonder if you could take YPC for RB, subtract out the YBC and then see how well they are at “extending” plays and breaking tackles
This is bullshit because it doesn’t say my oline is the best
I can’t help but be skeptical of an Oline ranking methodology that puts the lions middle of the pack
And I can’t help but be skeptical of an Oline ranking methodology that puts the Seahawks in the middle of the pack. But unfortunately I mean it the other way around.
In all seriousness I can’t either lol. Even with all the injuries we’ve had our oline has been pretty consistently strong. I also firmly believe the Decker-Jackson-Ragnow-Glasgow-Sewell combo is the best unit in the league (clearly no bias)
but that just means Goff/Gibbs/Montgomery are doing more with less…
Here’s something disgusting: Our line has been 100% healthy the entire season. Fuck.
I feel like you guys keep throwing money at good lineman I genuinely don’t understand how it’s consistently so bad
Or how ours is so good in such a quick turnaround. Especially with all the injuries and the fact that we don’t actually have a center. It’s wild.
Coaching. As others have said. Play calling hurts to. Barely running the ball is no fun for the line and sets them up to fail.
I’m not an expert, but there’s some semi-convincing explanations. First, they’re all bad athletes. Volson is actually the best by RAS and he’s the worst of them all. Our tackles are okay in a vacuum but each have clear weaknesses: OBJ is slow as hell (and possibly is playing through injury the last couple weeks) and Jonah is undersized. When they lose, they lose bad. Karras has been okay the last few games, but Cappa has been awful even though he was actually good last year. On the coaching side, it seems like they’re teaching the iOL to compress in pass pro which inevitably leaves Burrow with a tiny pocket with little room for error and little room to escape. Ultimately, it’s a low-upside line with suspect coaching where it’s pretty likely someone will screw up on any given play even if 4/5 of them are individually about average.
So glad the Chiefs were able to offload Orlando Brown Jr. to the Bengals. He was complete ass when playing for us and wanted way too much money.
Same. I remember Bengals fans praising this and the other NFL teams saying our OL was going to take a huge step back. I watch every KC game. Orlando Brown Jr looks like his legs are made of concrete. Any speed edge rusher just blows right by him. He’s better at blocking the run, but we don’t really run in KC. I can’t believe I am saying this, but I feel bad for CIN. The Burrow injury is crushing.
Well yeah, they aren’t making contact with anyone most of the time.
And it’s one of the most expensive in the league…again. Frank pollack is the only common denominator
The Penei Sewell vs Ja’Marr Chase debate has air again.
I hate our OL so much outside of literally only Trent
My only take on your entire post is that I hate how you chose to represent the Chiefs with KAN instead of KC. It took me a while to find us lol
Agreed. GNB is a crime
Given that we’re much higher than I expected on here I genuinely couldn’t find us for a long time.
They look like the abbreviations from the old Tecmo Super Bowl game, so I’m kinda ok with it.
Why are the new England Patriots’ initials NWE and not NEP?
New York Giants = NYG
New York Jets = NYJ
New England Patriots = NWE???
Kind of crazy how our line has still been as good as it’s been with all the injuries and playing a 7th round second year guy at LT
They’ve been good pass blocking, but they still struggle to move defenders when running the ball
And by struggle, we of course mean that they don’t move guys at all.
Seems about right for us
And we still have to go against Watt twice and Garrett one more time. Possible to be ranked 33rd?
I agreed with everything except the end. Lions #1 baby
There ain’t no way the Titans’ O-Line should be ranked this high. We couldn’t block a kid in crutches lmao
I think it should be weighted heavily on pocket time instead of whatever it is. There’s a lot of bad O-Lines in the league
I think it should be weighted heavily on pocket time instead of whatever it is.
We’re above average in pocket time because we run a ton of play action and max protect because our offensive line is terrible. I’m not sure pocket time accurately reflects performance either.
There’s not really a great statistic to measure offensive line performance because of scheme differences.
This might be the only person in the world that sees any value in our OLine because they sure as shit don’t look like that on tape. 21st, put that on the resume.
Came here to say exactly this. Our line is catastrophically bad.
Now that the dust has settled - I guess the Chiefs didn’t get wrecked in the off-season by “overpaying” Jawann Taylor and the Bengals didn’t get “a steal” by getting Orlando Brown…
Sacks are not an offensive line stat!
It’s TB not TAM