Lots of people complain that Tottenham are considered in the “big 6” so if they weren’t in the big 6 who would replace them

  • circa285@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Better question is who should replace City and Chelsea in the Big 6 after they systematically broke regulations to attain their current position.

    • ygog45@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      You’d be replacing a lot more than just two football clubs in that case

    • arachnarus96@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I feel like for Arsenal it’s good to have Tottenham competitive and even win a odd trophy or two every now and then. I mean, what is a rivalry if the rival is nothing. Like Chelsea and Fulham, it’s just boring, but Arsenal Tottenham is one of the best rivalries in the world imo.

  • triggerhappy5@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    There’s a historical argument for Aston Villa or Everton, and a fanbase/money argument for Newcastle, but realistically Tottenham are clearly a top 6 club.

    • DinoKea@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      They lost to Chelsea (who then drew with City), and then 2-1 to Wolves (who beat City 2-1) and that was that. Title hopes over.

      I’m not expecting them to be a proper contender for the title but Football fans are a bit fickle

      • New-Dog9178@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not with the injuries they’ve had. Losing Maddison was huge but VDV is probably a bigger loss

  • Klingh0ffer@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    People who says Spurs isn’t one if the big six, doesn’t understand what the term means.

  • Revolutionary-Ad5526@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    they are top 6.

    Leicester made a run for a few years but have faded. Everton felt like they were close for awhile and have consistency the last 20 years

  • Odd_Bad_7441@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Tottenham are 6th. That’s the problem they’re a clear 6th but significantly below the big 5

    • jedaga@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Newcastle, Everton, and Villa all have history. Unlike some clubs ;)

  • sindher@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s been 15 years since they last won a trophy so we’ll judge based off financial stuff? Games gone.

  • stevo_78@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Toon fan here. Spurs are 100% in the big 6, I’m not sure why anyone would suggest they should be replaced!