• Daver7692@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    13-7 is interesting.

    We can pretty much assume that City, Chelsea and Newcastle voted against.

    Would also assume with United’s incoming owner also having ownership of Nice they probably voted against.

    Still leaves 3 “against” clubs who are unknown.

    I know FSG have looked at buying other clubs but haven’t as of yet, given the ban was temporary I don’t see any benefit for us to vote against.

    • BrewtalDoom@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Villa, Bournemouth, Brighton, Chelsea, Crystal Palace, Nottingham Forest and Sheffield United are also part of multi-club owenership setups.

    • alb92@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you want to buy another club, or thinking about selling your club later, any precedent, temporary or not, towards the limitation of multi-club ownership might be something you’d vote against.

    • MemestNotTeen@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sky claims 11 (12 with United) teams have ties to other clubs so it’s actually a chase for the 4/5 that voted against their own interests (to some extent)

      Of those 11 it doesn’t even include Wolves which surprised me because I thought they have links in Italy and Portugal.