• neatchee@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I was making an admittedly weak reference to the death star trench run dialog. Not serious

    Honestly I find these types of questions silly since we have no way to compare the efficiency and efficacy of the different weapon and shielding types, or other on board tech and countermeasures.

    For all we know the falcon’s shields absorb phasers like they’re paper and its turret lasers eat the Enterprise’s shield at 5% per bolt. Or it could be the other way around. Not to mention this completely ignores tactics and strategy which is a huge part of it. The Falcon doesn’t do direct confrontation for a reason. Han is more likely to try to fake a surrender and then pull some shit once aboard for negotiations.

    And if we’re just gonna say “Trek tech is more advanced than Wars tech” we can just end the discussion there 🤷‍♀️

    • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s really hard to compare fantasy and sci fi too. Space acts different in star wars, it has wind resistance like properties as an example.

      • neatchee@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Totally. The fact is, once a society is beyond intra-stellar travel, with craft that do not do atmospheric flight, there is little reason not to go full borg and have ships with no real forward-facing direction to speak of