Looking at the rest of the current top teams in the NFL and their records against teams that currently hold a winning record:

  • Eagles (9-1) are 4-0

  • Ravens (8-3) are 4-2

  • Chiefs (7-3) are 3-2

  • 49ers (7-3) are 3-2

  • Jaguars (7-3) are 1-3

  • Cowboys (7-3) are 0-2

  • Dolphins (7-3) are 0-3

Part of the Lions’s low record against winning teams is due to a weaker NFC North this season (although Vikings currently hold a winning record and Lions have yet to play them). But it still stands that the Lions have had a relatively weaker schedule this year, and have not defeated a team with a current winning record since Week 1.

This stands to change with upcoming games against the Vikings (6-5) and Cowboys (7-3), as well as possibly the Broncos and Saints (5-5) depending on how their records turn out.

  • That_Murph@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t want to be a negative Nancy but I’m pretty sure that the next 4 weeks will flip one of those 2 teams’ record…

  • patienceandtime@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah well we will be back to .500 (1-1) against them after the Seahawks lose a couple more games. So joke is on you.

  • KKamm_@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t really see the point to this statistic tbh. Obvs I’m biased, but you could easily include the end of last season too since it’s basically the same team

  • Majestic_Reindeer439@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re good. I only wonder if Goff is gonna struggle in the playoffs like he did his last year or so with the Rams. Should be a tough out regardless.

  • RabidWolverine2021@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If Kelce and Chris Jones played in week one they would be 7-3 and 0-3 with teams over.500…no way they win at Arrowhead.

  • PSUDolphins@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lions are good. The frauds argument is so overdone. I see it parroted in every single thread with someone thinking they are posting an original comment.

    • Do__Math__Not__Meth@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m just tired of hearing the word “fraud” brought up in NFL discussions, mostly because there isn’t enough actual talent disparity in the league to call anyone that. Like it makes sense in college football because of recruiting, you can inflate your record by playing teams that have inferior talent across the entire roster; but in the NFL you’re playing teams that have all professional players and at the end of the day, winning is winning.

      At this point people just use the word “fraud” to tear down any team with a winning record that they don’t like

      • brianstormIRL@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The word fraud makes no sense in this league nevause we have seen repeatedly, every year, bad teams can randomly have amazing games and turn things around. It’s called any given Sunday for a reason. These guys can suck for weeks and suddenly put it together just like that. It’s happened before and will always continue to happen. There’s a reason a lot of the top players parrot the “winning in the NFL is fucking hard”. It’s almost like they’re on to something.

  • HoldMyPitchfork@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Broncos are 3-2 against teams with a winning record.

    But we’re also 2-3 against teams with a losing record

    So make of that however you will

  • empty33@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jags are 2-3 (wins over Buffalo and Pitt).

    They’re also 3-0 over teams that are .500 (2x colts and Saints), which feels relevant since they’d have a winning record without those losses. Which should also go for the rest of these teams.

  • CloudN3in@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    they lost to the AFC leader, beat the last Super Bowl champion at home, and nearly won against a good Seahawks team pre-offensive implosion

    still a good team at 8-2

  • Hobbit-dog91@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We’ve beaten a couple of teams that had winning records at the time of the loss. We can’t help the fact that losing to the Lions breaks the mentally weak.

    We’ve also only had 2 division games, one of them being this past weekend, at this point, so the weak NFC north doesn’t really matter in this argument. For whatever reason, the league decided to back load our season with division games

    • PsychoSaladSong@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      it really does feel like the NFL made the schedule extra weird this year.

      for example the broncos divisional games are raiders week 1 & 18, chiefs week 6 & 6, and chargers week 14 & 17. so that’s 2 opponents that we play multiple times in a very short span of time and then the raiders where it’s the longest span of time possible that we could play them in the regular season

      • The_Third_Molar@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We finished the season series against the Commies before even facing the Cowboys or Giants, and we will have played the Cowboys twice before playing the Giants Weeks 16 and 18.