amrit-9037@alien.topB to Books@metacritics.zoneEnglish · 1 year agoOpenAI And Microsoft Sued By Nonfiction Writers For Alleged ‘Rampant Theft’ Of Authors’ Workswww.forbes.comexternal-linkmessage-square106fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkOpenAI And Microsoft Sued By Nonfiction Writers For Alleged ‘Rampant Theft’ Of Authors’ Workswww.forbes.comamrit-9037@alien.topB to Books@metacritics.zoneEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square106fedilink
minus-squareErikT738@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYou do realize you’re contradicting yourself, right?
minus-squareNot_That_Magical@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoNope. Journals being accessible to everyone in an archive does not mean AI models should have carte blanche consent to use them to train.
minus-squaregoj1ra@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI understand what you’re going for, but that might be tricky legally. What special status does the archive have that allows it to make all that information accessible, that an AI model wouldn’t have?
minus-squareNot_That_Magical@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThe law is fucked and needs to catch up to AI stuff. DMCA, fair use etc is not built to handle scraping on the level AI does.
You do realize you’re contradicting yourself, right?
Nope. Journals being accessible to everyone in an archive does not mean AI models should have carte blanche consent to use them to train.
I understand what you’re going for, but that might be tricky legally. What special status does the archive have that allows it to make all that information accessible, that an AI model wouldn’t have?
The law is fucked and needs to catch up to AI stuff. DMCA, fair use etc is not built to handle scraping on the level AI does.