(and so if you want to discuss prolewiki you should join our discord to talk with the editorship directly). We’ve evolved our own demcent, our own community, policies etc over time.

1. Is there a Matrix space also for ProleWiki?
2. Should the Discord be prerered over posting on this community to

5 - we consider all anon edits individually, regardless of the IP attached.

Would it be advisable to request an account to

Is there any information about the breakthrough that makes the rusion power generation

I read this as being a step in the assembly of a fusion powerplant as such, but I don’t know

Any further info we could have?

Yeah, I guess. I kinda hinted at that idea too in my earlier comment on a previous post on /c/ProleWiki. (I don’t know how to properly link to them using Jerboa)

Thank you for your comments either way

No idea, but maybe you could incorporate the one’s you’ve already written down in your post?

For reference to people who also want a list or for anyone to add to it and not repeaththe ones you already have?

Hopefully there is some better centralized list someone more knowledgable than me can point out, but I think doing this would also be helpful.

As a suggestion

I would agree with that sentiment.

Do you think something of the sort could / should be added to the ProleWiki? Or is it said anywhere currently? (This is a /c/ProleWiki question, but I guess worth asking here)

I would agree. But then, do we not have any alternatives to FOSS as socialists?

Or would the only alternative be to change our material conditions by means or a revolution, which would allow for the ownership of the means of production and in turn liberate the proletariat from the burden of having their workforce exploited by capital?

Idk if I’m being liberal when asking ir there’s an in-between, but…I’d love to know if there’s any “Actually Existent Socialism (AES?)” transition state which allows for better software development during the transition. As a Software Development level.

(Bc ir you again go to the workplace level, then you get my original counterpoint; revolution, etc.)

I would assume that it could be useful in a transition state? Idk what China is doing, for example, with their source code to guard it from the west.

Has the author from the wikipedia article linked in the other comment on this post written about this specifically?

And I do see the point of organization being the true form of power, but then within the confines of software, isn’t FOSS the best way to organize and spread out to more people?

And even if it’s stolen, just the fact that it’s licensed as strong copyleft allow some easier code and software sharing for our benefit?

Caital considers it free labor they can re-appropriate.

I fail to see how this is the case with strong copy-left licenses, where there is no way for you to make proprietary software from it. (I think that’s the whole point. Right?)

Maybe by relicensing (can you do that?) Or by being the ones in control of the hardware, even if the software is free? So

You could self-host…but it’s gonna’ cost you, and you can’t afford that.

Same freedom as with:

You could just not work. But then you’d starve.

Hence freedom is only negative (normative), not positive?

Oh, I think I’d encountered his works in the past. Thank you for the reminder. Any personal recommendations?

Any recs for hosting?

I don’t know if there’s anything against being political (don’t think so, since /u/dessalines@lemmy.ml has one such repo), but I’d imagine Codeberg could be a good alternative to hosting your codebase, so long as it’s FOSS. And they include Codeberg in their recommendations for code hosting.

Yeah, honestly I can’t find the video where he mentions the citation. I only found this horrible take on 15 minute cities he uploaded 2 years ago:

https://youtu.be/gpjaOQC2y6k

DiegoRuzzarin is one of the biggest socialist content creators in South America, so I’m always surprised when I hear him opposing 15-minute cities, but I personally love the concept. He quotes some anthropology study when he does, but I always forget the author and title.

Thank you for the book recommendations!

Edit: one ofthe biggest -> one of the biggest

I think for an ML view we would prefer centralization instead of many splits and forks, merge everything into one big “hive” software that does everything.

I’d figured that would be the way to go, but I see most of the ML stuff like Lemmy being more aimed at federation and decentralization. Which could be like a “guerilla software” tactic of sorts. And using FOSS as means of protecting it from capitlist exploitation with the whole copyleft scheme.

Sorry for the confusion on my part regarding who, made what and why.

But then, what is to be done to the FOSS page on the wiki? And to reiterate, then the use of AGPL is usually endorsed within an ML framework?

I’d suggest that be written on the article rather than the current contents added by SovietPasiune, because I’ve had this question regarding what the best way to license my contributions to software without it feeling like I’m looking for libertarian-style freedom.

And perhaps something could also be added which included information about codeberg, maybe? https://docs.codeberg.org/getting-started/what-is-codeberg/

Or what are your personal opinions on the matter of software development? Maybe @desalines@lemmy.ml has some essays about it? Idk. But I’d love it if there was some resources which applied ML analysis to software and I haven’t found any yet. (Which is why I was originally excited for the ProleWiki article)

Either way, thank you for your response and the wiki. The essay on Gender Abolitionism I found very interesting.

Edit:

Or maybe some common DeGoogle alternatives or information regarding stuff like Open Street Map (OSM) or Matrix or more tech-related articles? (Or is that not the purpose of ProleWiki and I didn’t read the memo?)

Who is Richard Medhurst? And why is google the one at the forefront of safe hardware??

Edit: Because I want to get a new phone, but having Google hardware seems like too much of a cognitive dissonance for me, and I’d prefer sticking to smth Chinese, ideally.

So upon further investigation, it turns out that this information was added by a (now perma-banned) lemmy user Amicchanwho lost access to their Prole-Wiki account and apparently the page for Common Software was deleted by CriticalResist (@CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml ?) due to the ban of Amicchan, and the Revolutionary Technological Commitee page was deleted by Forte, but the content and the broken link used as source for the section on Attempts on Replacing Free Software section remains.

And since I’ve seen many or the Lemmy-related software being licensed under the AGPL license, I guess the whole concept just collapsed. But I’d love it if the Wiki then adapted the page on FOSS to reflect the current choice to use AGPL right now.

This is amazing!

I’ve only heard some counter-arguments to 15-minute cities saying that the people there don’t end up being able to buy from the businesses close by. Have you heard of something similar? Specifically from a Spanish-speaking YT DiegoRuzzarin.

I personally think it’s great to have 15-minute cities but I wanted to know your opinion on any counter-arguments to them.

NotJustBikes on YT is a (lib) channel in favor of 15-minute cities and urbanism in general.

Yeah, and something purposeful, ideally. But that’s hard to find, I guess.

I’d love te be able to work on FOSS, or something related. Because I don’t want my work to fill the pockets of some execs abroad. But I don’t know how feasable that is. Or where to look, even.