Burnerplumes@alien.topBtoApple@hardware.watch•AirTag Detected Near You ...for over 200 miles of driving and I don't own one.English
1·
1 year agoI’d say it depends on whether you’re armed or not. I wouldn’t want to go home and run into a potentially armed burglar if I didn’t have the means to defend myself.
To qualify my reply, I’m a former Navy strike fighter pilot.
I’m admittedly not a huge watch buff. Got a couple $3000+ watches, but nothing crazy. I would never fly with anything that does not glow constantly—which rules out most digital/LCD watches.
I tried flying with digital watches, but it was frustrating at night. When you’re flying, you need to be able to just glance at your watch—most watches with LCD displays require you press a button to illuminate them—this is a problem when you’re flying in formation, in the clouds, at night. You do not want to take your hands off the controls. Bad things follow.
I settled on an analog watch with tritium glow for the hours and both hands. An analog watch with large hands is also easier to scan quickly than a small digital display. I can glance and know the time, day or night.
I also want something robust that will remain in place during a high-speed ejection. Ejections often result in the loss of visors, entire helmets, gear from survival vests, and watches with flimsy bands.
A metal case and band watch with tritium fits the bill.
Lastly, this is something that most people don’t think about. But if you’re ever in an evasion scenario post-ejection where you need to pay off a local to hide/transport you, an expensive watch is like carrying many hundred to a few thousand dollars in cash on your wrist. Your time piece is a bargaining chip, and a G-Shock isn’t going to carry nearly the same weight.
When you are operating in truly unforgiving environments, there is far more to a time piece than its ability to keep accurate time.