• 0 Posts
  • 4 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 24th, 2023

help-circle
  • First off. Completely ignore all of the boneheads saying that “break in time” is only you getting used to the way something sounds.

    This is completely and totally wrong.

    All of the components that audio equipment is manufactured from have their “break in time” listed in the engineering specs for that component. Prior to the formation time of things like resistors and capacitors the value can drift wildly. And since the values of these components are what determines what the equipment sounds like, all audio equipment sounds different after use than when new. This is also why all components have a % deviation and formation time listed in the engineering specs. Because it effects more than sound. It can cause circuit failure.

    Better or worse depends on what the values are supposed to be and how close they end up after formation. But the value of every component changes over the first 50 hours of use.

    And if this were not the case, component manufacturers would not do the testing required to post the formation specs for their product. It is lengthy and expensive testing. That they only do because the electrical engineers who design things with those parts demand it. So they can predict the performance of whatever circuit they are designing.

    So ignore the “nothing matters, nobody can hear the difference” crowd. They have no idea what they are talking about. The values of components absolutely change over the first 50-100 hours and that absolutely changes the way audio equipment, particularly amplifier stages, sound.

    The only way to “burn in” a piece of equipment is to run it. It must have both signal in and load out to move current. Current is what forms the components.

    The fastest way being to run sine and/or square waves through it.

    But I’d suggest just plugging it in and listening to it as part of your system.



  • Not understanding the question.

    Given that humans haven’t yet figured out how to create circuits or mechanical devices that can perfectly amplify signals without distortion…there is no “endgame” state to be had.

    Therefore “Audiophile” is a description of a process. Not a description of a state.

    It is the “process” of evaluating how well any given combination of components reproduces audio in comparison to what you want it to sound like.

    And what you want something to sound like changes over time.

    Ergo, since there is no perfect technological solution, every component sounds different, every room sounds different with different components and your perception of what it is supposed to sound like is constantly changing…there is no “endgame” state. There is no combination of components that will be or remain “the best possible” over time.

    So the “endgame” IS the process of continually evaluating and improving.

    Thus, there is no need to search for the “endgame”. You are already there. You are participating in the process of evaluation and improvement. As long as you are enjoying that process and not otherwise messing up your life spending money you don’t have, you are quite literally…already there.

    So sit back and enjoy the process. It’s all you’ll ever get out of it.