Elizabeth Holmes is not a billionaire, was never a billionaire, and was in the end the one on the board who made the least money off Theranos. This doesn’t excuse her in any way, what she did was monstrous.

Edit: Also. Everything about her was an affect. A choice… The clothes and much of her mannerisms were explciit attempts to copy Steve Jobs, her voice was a put on she did after reading an article about people’s reaction to different kinds of voices, and I believe her wide eyed stare at the camera was also a thing based on some business psychology thing.
You are not getting some kind of authentic read on the billionaire mind off this picture. For 3 reasons.
1: You can’t derive the human soul from a picture.
2:Even if you could she’s actively trying to deceive you and all the details you look at are copied from others.
3:Even if you could see past that. She still wasn’t a billionaire.

Dinoprostone is essentially reverse tylenol, in that it is essentially just prostaglandin e2, and the cox 2 mediated synthesis of prostaglandin is the reaction tylenol stops (Cox 2 is used for multiple forms of prostaglandin synthesis, but e2 is pretty prominent in the pain reaction). I don’t know how effective it would be as a torture drug, I very much hope the answer is “Not very” given what it’s used for. You wrote this 2 months ago, I am searching for posts about tylenol because I’m mad at my doctor.

The label covers a set of symptoms (Pain, tiredness, depression, stiffness, and lack of rest from sleep), united only by being idiopathic. (Without a known cause).

From a diagnostic standpoint fibromylagia is throwing your hands in the air and going “Something’s fucky, but we don’t know what it is”. Which doesn’t mean that the person doesn’t suffer, some people with this diagnosis are basically bedridden and in agony (Others have mild aches and pains, which still sucks)

No they’re talking about general reduction of bed rest after birth, not that c sections have shorter hospital stays. It is also describing a process that originated in the 19th century, not a recent phenomenon.

That sentence is wrong. Women stay longer in the hospital after a c-section. You are right to question the article if that is what it says.

The fact that there is a profit motive behind the overuse of c-sections is a settled issue. There is. There are investigations, there are studies, and there are metaanalyses of those studies. C-sections are a relatively easy procedure with predictable results that minimise litigation risk. It is frankly absurd how high the incentive is for a hospital to perform one.
I can’t comment on your baby in particular. I don’t know the relevant facts and it would be wildly unethical to comment on it as a result. But with regards to whether there is a financial motive to perform c-sections in general the science is in.

But the two arent connected. If anything having a competent and powerful anti corruption investigative tool would help them fight Russia given the problems with corruption faced by the Ukranian military. Like do you think the Russians have every news agency in the west questioning this by the balls so they’ll say that making an corruption agency less independent is bad?

Are you not taking it seriously as in you dont believe its happening, or not taking it seriously as in you don’t believe its a big deal?