Even that may be useful as it stresses their relationship and thus the business model

Let me know if the new title doesn’t work?

Absolutely, let me try and figure out a better way to word that. Ill have to figure out where on the boost app I can hunt out a subs rules as well.

Thats kinda why I put it out there. Not saying its something i could pull off but it does seem like something someone with the right skills and motivation could pull off.

There’s a few problems I can see like them blocking IPs for account creation but I think thats something that can be overcome given that it is over by other such botnets.

I dont know if it really qualifies as a DDOS seeing as the goal would be more to waist their resources than it would be to “block” their services. Just felt close enough to where the name kinda conveyed the point. I didnt make any statements of intent. Everything ive said here is said hypothetically. There’s no concrete “plans” to do anything so im not worried about it.

Thanks tho.

Edit: Realized re-reading and fixing some typos that might have sounded sarcastic but I mean it, good looking out.

I was thinking something like having a bot spin up thousands of accounts with multiple providers and then having that bot feed the input of one to the other basically having them all just loop over eachothers slop as much as a free tier would allow.

On a single account this does nothing but imagine it being done by a botnet or even just a dedicated group with a few powerful computers. Everything one account hits its free their limit another account is spun up. Effectively bypassing the free tier limit.

Sure, the idea needs some work but I think theres something there.

What, a guys not allowed to keep a pet?

You and I both know why you are avoiding answering the question.

You arnt fooling anyone with your ad hominem attacks.

Be honest, you’re the kid who took his ball and went home the moment he started losing growing up huh? You know, the kid no one wanted to play with because he thought being a pandantic contrarian was a personality.

Don’t worry, you dont have to answer.

Its obvious.

Cool ad hominem.

Ok, ill make this simple.

Did I use AI to generate this art?

Yes or no?

Cheese is a myth pushed by big dairy to sell moldy milk

The only one making a fool out of themselves is you. Im not claiming anything about your position that you didn’t clearly state yourself.

The little robot that cleans is a tool. Only a fool would claim it is anything else.

When I turn on a vacuum and push it around I am using a TOOL to clean my house.

When I turn on the cleaning robot to clean my house, im using a TOOL to clean my house.

When i set a pre-programmed schedule for that little autonomous cleaning robot to clean my house every Wednesday I am STILL USING A TOOL TO CLEAN MY HOUSE.

Your argument is that there is some imaginary arbitrary % of work done at which the tool is no longer being used to fulfill a task and it somehow magically becomes an “entity” completing the task all on its own.

I dont need to lie about your position, I spent several comments pinning it down with various questions to make sure it was properly fleshed out before I broke it down and addressed it.

The part that is ACTUALLY unbelievable is that you are getting mad at me because you dont fully understand your own position on the topic and you are clearly incapable of extrapolating the conclusions of the arguments you are putting forward.

EITHER:

Ai is a tool humans use to complete a task in which case I used ai to make this art

Or

Its its own living entity completing tasks on its own, of its own free will in which case I didn’t make the art

There is no “third option” where AI is both a tool used in completing a task and also an entity that completes a task all on its own like you seem to want so badly to believe.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Now who’s avoiding.

First things first, my oven is voice activated. Point one, me.

So, just so we are clear here…your position is that AI is its own living entity and therefore NOT a tool.

Neat

If that’s the case then in your view, no. I didn’t make it. The “alive” ai I instructed to make it did.

In my view tho, the AI isnt alive and therefore is a tool I used to make the art…which means the only “flaw” in my argument is that you beleive AIs are alive.

So, when you gonna start advocating for AI rights? Or do you think AIs should stay enslaved to humanity?

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

The epstein class. You know, the same people who decided covid was an existential threat to humanity requiring lockdowns, experimental gene therapy injections and the largest transfer of wealth in human history(transfered to them unsurprisingly).

Im not avoiding the question. Im illustrating the logical conclusion of your argument.

Can a hammer build a house on its own? You can tell a hammer to build a house until your blue in the face but it wont because its inanimate. It is not alive.

If the “baker” in question is my oven that’s doing the baking then yes, I baked the cake.

If the “baker” in question is another human that is using an oven to do the baking then no, I didn’t bake the cake.

So either a human using an inanimate tool like AI to create something counts as the human making that thing and therefore ai art is art because it is made by a human using a tool

OR

AI is its own living conscious individual self and the art it creates isnt made by the human telling it to make the art…in which case your argument is that AI is alive and the art it creates isnt art because ONLY humans can create art(animals and potential alien life be damned).

So which is it. Is AI a tool used by humans or is it alive?

So AI a tool used by humans then?

Is little Bobby Kennedy in the room with us right now?