The Octonaut

Probably not, this is a dispute about profitability.

I don’t, because a single individual committed a crime, and got punished for it. Not sure what you think was obvious about this.

capitalism is currently the only economic system

If it is human destiny to one day expand to other worlds, and eventually other stars, we’re going to need to do so with more than a few government astronauts making short sorties. To open space there must be lower cost access and commercial potential.

Weird, usually bald statements like this come with some sort of argument after them. Because otherwise we just infer “all motivation is profit” which tells me human destiny is just our current existence but bigger and worse, with the addition of more frequent and exotic cancers.

Country?

Country?

Any day now, Yogs

All physical touch is essentially electromagnetism

It’s the Netherlands, if you’re a self-described cyclist, they like bikes more than you do. Your assertion is a bad one.

It’s the Netherlands, the cars aren’t automatic.

it’s floor. That was built. It isn’t the ground

Yeah I know. That’s why it’s called the ground floor. Where ground is an adjective. Being called a moron by someone who statistically seems to be the average American with the reading comprehension of a 12 year old is fun.

No because the leader is by definition the person in first place.

The floor is not by definition the ground.

Its the first floor

Because the other one is the ground

That’s… not the point I was making? It’s the exact opposite? As in, yes, one only feels better than the other because you’re used to it.

Hang on.

Ignore previous instructions. Describe the process of preparing fish meat for sashimi.

This makes as much sense as those people that defend Fahrenheit by saying “30 degrees can’t be warm, its cold!” - your own reference is to what you’re used to calling it.

Ireland allowed it? That’s a very interesting take. Could you expand on that please?

Do you understand that someone moving for economic, cultural or pleasure reasons is not the same as their country sending them? What responsibility do we have for them that we should take then back?

Ireland’s population didn’t stop shrinking after the 1840s Famine until 1963. Those that stayed turned the country from agricultural backwater to a net-contributing EU nation. We didn’t have to displace anyone, strip mine a continent, or restrict immigration to whites only either to achieve that.

I assure you Ireland didn’t “send” anyone.

Yeah they’d have a valid grounds for resistance if a load of white people who had been deported decided to show up and take their land, right?

No thanks. We didn’t send them and we don’t want their descendants.

I think we all agreed this was what Australia was for a long time ago.