When does something become an OS feature and when is it an add-on? Consider the use case. If you need to make a backup or restore data from one, by having this as part of the OS it is always available. It’s line having vi installed; it comes with every Linux distro, but a lot of folks use Emacs. It makes sense that this should be a system component.
I’ll still argue that HD-DVD is mostly the better technology. The things which BRD tried to claim were what made it better were not things which would fundamentally have stayed with BRD. The interactive layer was finalized first on HD-DVD and was better.
All that said. I have many HD-DVDs and the drive. Before my drive fails, how would I archive my movies. 🤔
I went and saw Barbie twice. I caught the show when my fiancée was out of town, then took her out to see it when she got back. The movie works on a lot of levels and I thought it was well done. Great writing, great cast.
Yup, that is true. Didn’t know that you were only referring to the Documents case, although the number referenced would have made that clear if I thought about it.
Hacker vs. cracker. Hack isn’t a nefarious term, or at least it shouldn’t be. Hacking is just using something in an unintended way. The problem is with how DMCA made that am illegal thing to do if there was a digital lock. While intended to mean you can’t bypass CSS to rip movies from DVDs, it’s been used to block the right to repair and other things completely anti-consumer. But you probably know this.
I didn’t know. With the MP3/Streaming era, albums aren’t what they used to be. That isn’t to say that an artist and record producer won’t put together a selection of tracks in a specific order to evoke emotion beyond the tracks themselves, but the era of the opera is mostly past; no more Tommy, or The Wall. Most people who listen to an artist today are going to acquire just the songs they want to hear and not the set. I wonder if it isn’t more of a strategy to encourage fans to buy a/any complete album, instead of a selection of individual tracks? Hearing something on a full album you might not hear otherwise could be intended as a reward, rather than a gotta collect them all game of encouragement.
let’s not even start about how capitalistic she is with 18 versions of one album.
I think it says more that she recreated the albums to regain her rights of ownership. Yes, that is capitalism, but I think it’s better that she gets a say than the record companies for a contract she signed early in her career. It would be better if she used that position to relax the copyright and encouraged derivative works, but I’d rather she has that control than the labels.
Even if it were inspired, it is significantly different the way it’s written. I’ve hit these same challenges before, so I’m more inclined to think it is independent discovery.
Probably for the same reason Spanish used to consider ch, ll, and rr as a single character.