7·
2 天前
Lecornu quit first thing this morning
- 0 Posts
- 23 Comments
Joined 4 个月前
Cake day: 2025年6月10日
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Seven over his two terms. Three since his party lost its relative majority last July
“New” in this case means almost literally a permutation of the same people, with two ‘additions’ from previous failed governments.
1012·9 天前I was also under the same impression, but it seems to have grown less clear?
https://voxpoliticalonline.com/2025/09/15/tyler-robinsons-groyper-connection-truth-or-conspiracy-theory/In any case, Kirk enjoyers have never been known to let facts get in the way of their hate
2·9 天前Another way to look at it is “one can’t fuck children, because fucking implies consent so you should use the appropriate term which is rape”, which is what I believe they meant.
The tweet is a lie, the photo is from a novelty shop (thx falcunculus@jlai.lu)
At a glance it even looks like an AI wrote the whole thing, doesn’t it?
EDIT: 3 posts in history, all with the same hollow Green LinkedIn vibe…
“Une graine dans le bocal piment” ?
4·11 天前Actually 157 out of 192 UN countries recognize the state of Palestine right now. When Crimea was invaded by Russia in 2014 and Israël had already been occupying parts of it illegaly for over 40 years, the count was 133. As soon as 1994, even before Netanyahu’s first tenure, there were more than half (96) UN member states recognizing the state of Palestine.
Most countries absolutely do and have recognized Palestine and the imperialism that goes on there is old as fuck. Yours maybe doesn’t, mine only switched this year as a mostly performative act. Source: even a passing glance at wikipedia
5·16 天前Unfortunately not. Quantum teleportation is an awful name: it’s called that way because it implies “destroying” a quantum state somewhere, and “recreating” it identically somewhere else, effectively transmitting information. However, the process also requires a classical information transfer at some point, and is absolutely not instantaneous . It’s only useful for cryptography because it’s mathematically impossible to listen in on this information being transferred without disturbing it.
It’s one of the most unfavorable coolness-of-name vs. coolness-of-actual-thing ratio in physics.
141·9 天前I don’t know about this Milhouse business, but he did have some very salient points: that time he gushed blood uncontrollably from his neck and died has raised serious doubt in my previously staunch anti-gun disposition. Now I have to manually remind myself that most gun violence victims are unfortunately not Charlie Kirk.
Maybe one of them performed their spell over the dark web, with bitcoin as sacrifice.
Tolerance is not an absolute principle, it’s just a social contract. People who breach it aren’t protected by it; end of paradox.
That and making, in what should be seen as the sole crowning jewel upon a veritable turdwagon of a life as a professional waste of carbon, the best argument in favor of gun violence since Brian Thompson
At least he died doing what he loved
2·1 个月前Thanks!
Do you know where I could find more about the “correct” usage of ð then? My understanding was only the voiced/unvoiced thing, I’d like to know more.
Nothing to so with the substance of your comment, but may I ask why always þ and never ð?
It is. It could be construed as a form of constitutional brutalism: in theory the president is free to name whomever he chooses, however he is expected to choose someone from the parliamentary majority.
But this is the first time in the history of the current constitution that the parliamentary majority isn’t an absolute majority or cannot form an absolute majority coalition. The consequence is that they can’t systematically no-confidence-vote out any head of government they don’t approve of, and basically enforce this expectation directly.
So Macron can just name someone from his minority (3rd biggest group even) and wait for the parliament to (more or less slowly) disagree enough with it that they’ll agree to no-confidence-vote it out (usually when the government proposes a budget). Then, every time a prime minister is ousted, he can pretend he’s not violating the constitution – in spirit if not in letter – when he starts again. He can frame it as defending the republic against “extremes” even though the relative parliamentary majority he’s “defending against” is just a loose leftist alliance between parties that span from barely liberal to a bit more angry, but not extreme even by the state council’s own definition. The second biggest group, however, is actually the far-right authoritarian racist party founded by literal ex-SS that’s going to win a presidential election at some point if he keeps trying to out-authoritarian them.