Ehh, if you’re calling your ML stuff AI then that’s on you (and you’re probably not technically serious about what you’re doing anyway). Other people are pointing out that AI isn’t a term that many compsci/software people would use, and neither the article (or afaict the study) or my experience suggest that ML has the same negative association as AI.

darn shame i can’t see the photo on mobil

Pivot to landscape orientation

The use of anthropomorphic language to describe LLMs is infuriating. I don’t even think bullshit is a good term, because among other things it implies intent or agency. Maybe the LLM produces something that you could call bullshit, but to bulshit is a human thing and I’d argue that only reason that what the LLM is producing can be called bullshit is because there’s a person involved in the process.

Probably better to think about it in terms of lossy compression. Even if that’s not quite right, it’s less inaccurate and it doesn’t obfuscate difference between what the person brings to the table and what the LLM is actually doing.