The EU is in no position to challenge or confront the US on anything. But a Greenland annexation will completely weaken the level of internal unity in the EU.

Liberal Europeans have been desperating hoping that the external “enchroachment” of the US and Russia will unite the continent in class collaboration. But neither Greenland nor Ukraine are actually part of Europe, they are colonies. The nationalist angle is weak.

On top of that, class collaboration only works when you have benefits, or the prospect of benefits to entice people. Europe is on a long term retreat, it cannot successfully remain united for long in the future, much less become more united.

America can also use Greenland as a carrot on a stick to get the European bourgeoise to do its bidding. European states/businesses who help America take over European infrastructure get to participate in the “development” of Greenland. In this time of economic decline due to Russian/Ukrainian supplies being supressed, how many European states will resist the opportunity?

No it boils down to “we kicked the Japanese fascists out and have a pretty decent standard of living now compared to the rest of the world”

Not OP, but you can easily find statistics on public transportation, wages, healthcare/life expectancy, government approval, ecological policies, technological development, energy use and so on.

Collecting these statistics takes too much time for a single comment, but you can find statistics from a wide variety of sources such as the world bank, imf, rand (western sources), or Chinese sources like Chinese government data (like from the national burea of statistics).

Either way, the data is quite favorable for China and Chinese citizen’s quality of life. They have a higher life expectancy than Americans, world class public transport, the world’s best green energy industrial complex (by such a huge margin that in comparison, the rest of the world might as well not try). It is quite a decent place to live in, baring the issues with low wages, youth unemployment and high working hours (compared to western nations, as least until the fascists de-develop the west enough).

unless they are rival imperialists in which case the “bone to grind” is with imperialism.

This is where the issue comes down to because many western leftists pretend, based on their own misunderstandings that many western rivals are imperialists, despite the fact that many of these western rivals have a net export of surplus labor/commodities, being exploited by international capital, therby having a class interest opposite of imperialism.

Not to mention the military encirclement that these nations face, which their enemy nationalists take as some sort of natural God-given equilibrium. Deviating from this encirclement by forceful measures is then taken as a sign of evil/imperialist ambition, meanwhile leftists at home in the west fail to resolve military encirclement by pressuring their governments. I mean, for how many decades has Cuba been under a blockade? What horrific conditions gaza has been subjected to. Can any of these situations be resolved without force? And if these people use force, they get called imperialists.

In the interests of fairness, the PRC during Mao and Deng’s time also famously considered the USSR to be “social imperialists”, helping cause the downfall of the USSR and setting back socialism by a century. So this isn’t exclusively a western leftist problem.

“Our glorious people’s Ministry of Truth has determined that their wretched Mistry of Truth is lying while assuring us that OUR Ministry of Truth would never lie”

My sibling in christ, do not insult my intelligence. The gaza genocide isn’t even over. At least wait for the bodies to become cold before you start defending western media institutions.

I don’t know what you’re trying to do here, encouraging racism instead of criticism of the state?

It is a common deflection that I have seen. Furthermore, it is quite stupid as well, since governments don’t fall from the heavens. They are made from the people. Modern states are not small warlord bands, but significant fractions of the entire populace and economy.

None, if you’re a principled anarchist. That’s why I don’t have a fundamental problem with anarchists (other than my philosophical objections to anarchism)

However, many self-proclaimed anarchists do in practice support imperialists because they have a big bone to grind with AES states or even anyone who positions themselves against western imperialism.

They internalise western propaganda against these states/nations, because I guess, it’s a state so therefore it must be as comically evil as the worst fearmongering described by anglophone media. Or my favorite, “even only 10% of the atrocities were real, they would still be super evil”, that kind of thinking.

Of course, I have some contact both with actual chinese or russian people (many of whom aren’t even socialists), and they clearly have a much deeper and nuanced understanding of their nations than the even the most “I hate the government not the people” type of western anarchists. It makes the anarchists come off as silly white supremacists.

Most likely, if my contact with anarchists had begun with third world anarchists, I would never have had a phase of hating anarchists (which itself was a silly thing to do). But either way, I still find Marx more compelling than any anarchist writer, so I am still philosophically a Marxist.

I read marx/lenin, found them to be compelling.

I am very interested in the science of economic planning and ecosystem management.

Originally, I considered myself to be an anarchist, but other anarchists had a very strong tendency of supporting imperialists in their actions against non-western countries, and frankly, I’m not white enough to be tempted by the benefits I would not be gaining from installing rightist dictatorships in Venezuela or China or Cuba if the “anarcho-bidenist” types had their way.

Looking back at it I find the whole “fight” between anarchism and marxism-leninism to be very silly, but since I think that China and Hamas are actually doing useful work, this automatically makes me incompatible with many anarchists.

Domestic policy is always linked to foreign policy (no marxist-leninist should ever deny this), but we’ll have to “agree to disagree” about how much causal weight colorism specifically should be given here. Not that capitalism is a linear system to begin with assignable weights to causal inputs.

What it comes down to is this part

in this context the Indian elite act like Honorary Aryans, they would like to be the top “Whites” so exceeding the US would not be outside of their class paradigms.

Increasing wealth and accumulating value are fundamental drives of capitalism. White or not, the desire to be seen as Honorary aryans has little to do with it. And it’s not as if they can’t keep acting white while the nation itself pursues a nationalist capitalist development path (look at Russian liberals)

It was a nod to white supremacism.

The Indian ruling class has colorist and pro-western brainworms, but using the ideas of white-supremacy to say anything about the decisions they will make in the long-run just boils down to a form of idealism.

It would be no different from me saying that the Americans wouldn’t mind becoming Ukraine 2.0 because America has a lot of nazis.

I’m not so sure at present. There is a reason why Fair and Lovely is still a billion dollar industry.

I have to say that this is a really idealistic and frankly dumb comment. The actions taken by the ruling class of a nation depend on the class situation and economy. And India is too big as a single political entity to just remain as a vasal/dickriders in the long term to the US. As Indian capital accumulates, the national bourgeoise of India will not be content with being mere subordinates.

The situation is different with Japan, south Korea, and the EU. The former 2 were directly militarily occupied by the US. The latter is highly divided, and its members were also militarily occupied by the US during WW2 and the cold war.

I know it’s popular in the west these days to attribute anything that goes wrong in their countries as being Russia’s fault, but this level of paranoia is genuinely absurd and funny. Like seriously, Putin is personally ordering Russian spies to … do arson attacks on random IKEA stores?

Although attribution is often difficult, and some incidents will have nothing to do with Russia

One would think that the statement that follows this would be something like “on occasion, conclusive evidence has been found of Russian spies committing petty acts of vandalisim”, or something like that. But no, there isn’t even a pretense of there being any sort of evidence in this article. It just says “it is clear”, and vaguely references a UK intelligence officer (what a trustworthy source!)

Unlike the USSR, Putin’s Russia is essentially post-ideological.

Meaningless statement (post-ideology does not exist), and also demonstrably false given that Putin very openly adopts a Christian and a nationalist position/policy.

hard-left anticapitalism

Ah, so it’s that thing where the self-proclaimed “moderates” pretend that everyone who opposes them and their socio-economic agenda is secretly a Russian agent. Got it.

such as the placing of cameras along Polish railway lines on which aid to Ukraine flows.

Mixing incidents of what are likely legitimate spying with random petty crime does not mean that the random petty crime was also some Russian plot.

It also contributes to another Kremlin (and, indeed, Chinese) talking point, that removed western democracies simply don’t work.

The poverty and dysfunction of western societies is not the fault of the scary foreign boogeymen.

This also highlights another virtue of this new strategy for the Kremlin: it encourages and mobilises our own paranoia.

Lmao the article itself is fueling this paranoia.

The answer was — and is — not to let that panic us or force a change in policy: to keep calm and carry on.

This is something Europeans are failing spectacularly at.

Goated ruling. I have nothing negative to say about it which is rare for news these days.

The investor has also claimed the way Nvidia’s graphics chips are accounted for is incorrect, claiming they have a much shorter use life than has been suggested.

Last month, he revealed bets against Nvidia and Palantir of more than $1bn (£760m), allowing him to make a significant profit if the stock fell.

Everyone in this whole ordeal is a scammer one way or another. Whether they bet on AI or against it.

This would not be a problem if they could fix the economy. Fundamentally speaking, people who oppose immigration either do it out of economic anxiety or racism. The first can be solved by regular socialist policies, while the latter are an irrational bunch of reactionaries that will continue to oppose the left no matter what.

Minor point about the quintiles.

They are not misrepresented. The range of different quintiles is usually different. The point is, each quintile contains the name number of data points (neighbourhoods in this case).

So 20% of neighbourhoods have an average between 0 and 33k. And 20% of neighbourhoods have an income between 65k and 246k.

middle class hitlerites, and it’s the child of registered nurse who is also a single mom.

Can the child of a single mom nurse not be a hitlerite? I mean, what else are we supposed to call people who run the imperial death squads?

“Billionaires are hoarding money” is what I would expect to hear from a reddit radlib railing against wealth inequality, much less from an econ professor who uses this idea to suggest that billionaires are actually good.

At the end of the day, the electoral system is a contest of strength between 2 or more cults of personality. This is more prevalent in some countries than other, but the very basic aspect of representative “democracy”, aka elections (selecting a person to rule) basically boils down to giving a few people the power to make decisions for everybody else. It’s dictatorial by nature.

Anti-China propaganda has gotten real lazy these days. This is what the Americans are getting for 1.6 billion dollars?

Fair enough. I didn’t follow him closely in the early days so I didn’t know exactly the details.