Thanks NATO.

The people want to be free as in Ukraine. Look how that “reasonable” policy worked out for them.

Yes and relevantly here it also ceases the necessity of total eradication.

So you dont have a source of this definition? Because in international law its defined quite differently, which is quite obvious since your definition, as given, would not classify many real instances as genocide.

What do you mean by your last point. Genocide only being on whole population. Where did you get this definition.

Damn I never thought about this narrative. Its kidna funny that scary russians interfere with the US elections, while literally all US corporations which run social networks interfere with all countries elections excluding those where they are banned.

Well in the us case and precisely Vietnam, it would not be difficult to show that blacks were disproportionately drafted. The treatment of blacks could then be argued to be intentional. In the case of Ukraine I agree with the mass murder wording, for genocide I think that intent needs to be shown. So zelensky would need to intentionally kill the citizens(as in that being the goal), instead of ‘just’ using them like cheap meat for the machine.

Let’s not forget that most countries also have constitutions. The citizens constitutional rights cannot be overshadowed by draft. Therefore forcible totalitarian draft is not legal. Here it’s problematic because sovereign legal institutions are non existent in Ukraine and lets admit that in many states legal institutions would crumble when defending citizens rights against violent governments.

Doesn’t Polish border patrol newly have the right to shoot at any illegal immigrants attempting to cross? See the crime isn’t shooting a human being, the crime for which many stasi members were sentenced was not being properly chauvinist.

Sophism 101. Do you have anything referring to what I presented?

I’m sorry you seem quite misinformed. 1. By predenting not to know which natives I’m talking about. 2. By having issues with blaming also catholics for colonialism? If you have not studied the matter perhaps don’t show your lack of knowledge. Christianity and colonialism by Howitt is mentioned by Marx in capital. Howitt begins by noting that it was primarily papal bull, which in the eyes of catholics legitimized the division of america. It stole the land from under the natives. Then he goes to describe individual colonies, and the treatment of natives. Good read.

Guess. Also how did you infer from the article that ONLY jews were blamed?

Well it depends which natives are we talking about.