Won 2 games we should have won and lost 2 games most expected to lose……we cant draw any considerable conclusions yet. Cant even judge the OC ……everyone is green, so you expect errors.

Errors in decisions, errors in play calls, errors in execution, errors in game planning……the only place we can have any reasonable expectations is the defense where we still have our old coordinator.

Im not saying AOC is it (his pocket movement is currently broken) or AP (odd in game decisions) but they are where we expected them to be……no more, no less.

The remaining strength of schedule is tough ….but has winnable games so that’s really where we can evaluate both the coach and qb.

  • droid327@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I generally agree with you, but I disagree with “expected to lose”

    If you go by expectations, we’re a bottom tier franchise. We’re not expected to win many games at all. So we’re going to have to start winning games we’re not expected to win, or else there’s no real point to any of it

    • callmesir1977@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I would say 4 out of last 5 are considered “winnable.” Denver is looking tougher as the season wears on though, definitely not a layup. Can we go into KC and win on Christmas Day, not likely, but we will need the other 4 to be W’s in order to have a chance at the playoffs. I am looking to see if this team rallies around AP and gets it done or not.

      • droid327@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        They’re all winnable, yes - but in terms of “expected to win” by the general NFL public…I think MIN, LAC, and KC are all “expect us to lose” games.