Pete Hahnloser@beehaw.org to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agoFCC says “too bad” to ISPs complaining that listing every fee is too hardarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square141fedilinkarrow-up1410arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmit.onlineglobalnews@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@zerobytes.monstertech@kbin.socialtechnology@lemmy.worldbrainworms@lemm.eetechnology@lemmit.onlinetechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up1410arrow-down1external-linkFCC says “too bad” to ISPs complaining that listing every fee is too hardarstechnica.comPete Hahnloser@beehaw.org to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square141fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmit.onlineglobalnews@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@zerobytes.monstertech@kbin.socialtechnology@lemmy.worldbrainworms@lemm.eetechnology@lemmit.onlinetechnews@radiation.party
minus-squareWarmSoda@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoI recommend reading either the quoted text, or the article. Preferably both.
minus-squareconciselyverbose@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI did. “Passing on costs” is entirely irrelevant to everything. The entire point of all of this is that service providers are using nebulous fee structures to lie about pricing. That’s the entire thing. There is nothing else.
I recommend reading either the quoted text, or the article. Preferably both.
I did. “Passing on costs” is entirely irrelevant to everything.
The entire point of all of this is that service providers are using nebulous fee structures to lie about pricing. That’s the entire thing. There is nothing else.