• Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    NYC covers about 800 square km. Moscow is 2,500 square km and much bigger than that if you count the adjoining metropolitan areas. The standard “America is different because so big” argument doesn’t work against the largest country on earth by area.

    Moscow traffic is also notoriously shit so it’s not like that’s a differentiating factor either.

    Plus, the likes of London and Paris also have old metro systems that are much better maintained than NYC, so idk what combination of excuses NYC has.

    • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it is more of a “this won’t work because traffic in New York is too bad.”

      Which is like…yeah? That’s kind of why the metro desperately needs an upgrade, so more people can use it and prevent the gridlock?

      • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree.

        It’s a damned if you do, damned if you don’t scenario.

        These stations need to be upgraded, repaired, and overhauled, but it’s not as simple as “close these stations down and invent a magical bus system for the time bieng”. It’s an extremely sensitive situation and I don’t feel like people are understanding. It’s not that it shouldn’t happen, but the level of disruption would be catastrophic for thousands of people. It’s a bad situation.