• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Anytime anyone says we should follow in the footsteps of the USA you just know it’s greed

    In this case it’s just “I want to squeeze people but also act as if .y food isn’t expensive”

  • tehWrapper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    221
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    If you want to charge more just raise your prices… hidden fees and extra costs should not be allowed in any billing.

    • manxu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Especially not as a flat percentage! I could understand a cover charge, a corking fee, or a fee for substitutions, but if everything gets a 20% charge, then it’s really just pretending the prices are lower and nothing else.

  • Jiral@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’d hope flat x % surcharges are a violation of price transperancy rules in the EU but it could be that it is possible like in the UK. But it shouldn’t.

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Yeah. In nearly every way, the US and it’s systems are a puuuuuurfect example we should all defenitely follow. Hmm hmm.

    Putting the responsibility of fair wages for your employees on your customers is just a dick move. Treat your employees fairly or do the dishes yourself.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    So he did it on New Year’s Eve and 4 month later whoever is writing this article still doesn’t now if it’s permanent or just one time thing? Great journalism.

      • naught101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Why is raising process on public holidays bad? (As long as the staff are also getting paid more)

        • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Because the price on the menu should be what you are obliged to pay.

          If they want to increase prices on holidays, they should print a menu with the correct prices.

          • naught101@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            The surcharge is written on the menu… Printing two menus is wasteful and annoying.

            Lots of places add a 10-15% surcharge on holidays here (Australia). As long as they are up-front about it, it’s not that hard to do the math in your head…

        • Jiral@lemmy.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Because hiding prices in obscure surcharges is deliberately misleading customers. Given that they are surely having a special menu for the occasion they can easily print the true prices instead of fake prices. I would avoid shady places doing that. If they fool customers when it comes to paying who knows how the fool them in the kitchen.

  • magnue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Just raise the prices of the food if you want more money. Simple as that.

  • Ziggurat@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    14 hours ago

    This is crazy, especially in a gastronomic restaurant where staff is paid well over market, especially for all the specialized waiter whose salary can compete with Upper middle management in tech.

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    As long as it is visible before you order and comes explicitly in the final bill…it is just the tabled price…they’re just forcing you to take extra steps…

    On the other hand…I dont want anyone bugging me to pay them extra on top of the bill, I’m not their boss.

    • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Nah fuck that, just increase prices by 20%, this is deliberately misleading pricing and shouldn’t be allowed to spread.

      Infact he should get aasaice fine just to send a message!

      • nogooduser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Doing this is different to increasing the price.

        Firstly, from a PR point of view, it tells people that the extra money is going to the staff and not the restaurant.

        More importantly, in the UK, we are legally able to object to a service charge placed on the bill and they have to remove it.

        • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          Doing this is different to increasing the price.

          No it’s not it’s litterally increasing the price

          it tells people that the extra money is going to the staff and not the restaurant.

          They’re always free to publish their books if they care about transparency.

          we are legally able to object to a service charge placed on the bill and they have to remove it.

          Great so assholes can get a 20% discount.

          Menu prices should add up to what you are expected to pay, you don’t add taxes, you shouldn’t add service, those are expected functions of a restaurant, and the moment you give buisnesses an inch, they’ll keep pushing until the price you pay at the end is tangential to what they list in the menu.

          Your £20 main becomes £20

          +20% tax

          +20% service fee

          +5% tip

          +10% London rent fee

          +5% booking fee (brought to you by Ticketmaster)

          +7.2% Mercury in retrograde insurance

          Which is only slightly worse than a US bill

          If you want to charge me £24 just update the fucking menu!

          • nogooduser@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I do agree with you in that it’s much better for the price to be the price and for tips to be entirely up to the customer.

            That’s how it is in most UK restaurants in my experience but tips being added on already is creeping in. It used to be for large groups, then smaller groups and now a few places do it for everyone. Very annoying.

            Great so assholes can get a 20% discount.

            You’d be being an asshole if you were just doing it on principle but I have received bad service and asked for the tip to be removed. I didn’t feel like I was being a dick.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        yeah its like if they want put a price in parenthesis for each item to show what it will really cost. Heck show the cost of ingredients and then the cost for the service to prepare it and then the cost for service to take your order and stuff and then how much is the restaurants profit if they want full transparency.

  • venusaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The service fees should only apply to people who are over a certain income level or net worth. You get a mark on your ID to show that you’re rich. No mark, no fee.